2006 Employees Absence Schedule

[Doni]

I used the 2005 Employees absence Schedule this past year, and can not find
an updated version for 2006.

----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.

http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...-9921-da4048e70310&dg=microsoft.public.access

 

[Mike Labosh]

I used the 2005 Employees absence Schedule this past year, and can not find

an updated version for 2006.

What about modifying your existing application so that it doesn't care what
year it is? Then just change the affected queries so operate from a Year
Parameter either from the Year() function or a user prompt?

--
Peace & happy computing,

Mike Labosh, MCSD

"When you kill a man, you're a murderer.
Kill many, and you're a conqueror.
Kill them all and you're a god." -- Dave Mustane

 

[Larry Linson]

Just for the record, only the online UI provides the capability to vote on
suggestions. Many of us do not use the online UI to access
microsoft.access... newsgroups.

Secondly, I see a statement, but do not see a suggestion. The suggestion
would have to be inferred.

And, is there some reason you cannot follow Mike's suggestion of making the
likely-very-minor modifications to use the same database or same template
for 2006?

Larry Linson
Microsoft Access MVP

 

[Larry Linson]

vote for me

I read this newsgroup, normally, with Outlook Express, which does not permit
"voting". That is what I was explaining to the original poster.

Just as a matter of interest, for what office are you running?

Larry Linson
Microsoft Access MVP

 

[Guest]

vote for me

Just for the record, only the online UI provides the capability to vote on
suggestions. Many of us do not use the online UI to access
microsoft.access... newsgroups.

Secondly, I see a statement, but do not see a suggestion. The suggestion
would have to be inferred.

And, is there some reason you cannot follow Mike's suggestion of making
the likely-very-minor modifications to use the same database or same
template for 2006?

Larry Linson
Microsoft Access MVP