A stupid question

[Mico]

Okay, I'm trying to make some websites for local companies. What I do is, I
open notepad and just type up all the HTML from memory. I use photo-editting
software along with scanned photos, etc, and make it all the old fashioned
way. I don't do anything flashy (nor do I get paid to!) and like it's always
been, oh, one website a month. Just for fun. Now I've actually got a few
small (heavy emphasis there) businesses wanting me to make their websites.
(Note that they do all the hosting, etc, I just make it look purty).

I am starting to get tired of spending hours upon hours sitting in front of
a computer and typing out the HTML language. Now, I know there's software
out there to simplify this; I'm only a half-dunce. What I would like to know
is, which is more "user friendly," Dreamweaver or Frontpage? I've read
reviews and they both sound nice, and I've asked some folks who use
Dreamweaver what they think about it and now I'd like to hear from you
Frontpage people. Is it easy to use? Is the user interface easy to catch on
to? I'd rather not have to go out and buy both softwares, you know, but like
I want the one that's going to give me the smallest migraine. Can anyone
give me their opinions? I'd be eternally grateful. Thanks!

 

[MD Websunlimited]

IMHO, FP is easier to learn and use than DW.

--
Mike -- FrontPage MVP '97-'02
J-Bots 2004 102 Components For FP
http://www.websunlimited.com
FrontPage Add-ins Since '97 FP 2003 / 2002 / 2000 Compatible
Download the Trial http://www.microsoft.com/frontpage/downloads/addin/launchupdate/download.asp

 

[Murray]

Try them both.

DW has a steeper learning curve than FP, but if you already know HTML well,
then it will be more rational. And, if you are using CSS it will be a much
better choice for you. FP is simple to use, but has a somewhat intrusive UI
that can get a bit in the way, particularly if you are trying to get at the
important details.

In the final analysis, they are both tools to the same end. You can produce
outstanding pages with either.

 

[Wally S]

Why is DW better if you are using CSS? I use CSS with FP, and it works fine
and is extremely convenient. I have never used DW. I started with FP 98, and
was up and running in about an hour, and I had never worked on a website
before, knew nothing about HTML or CSS. The only problem is that FP 2003
does not come with that neat little handbook that came with FP 98 and 2000.

Wally S

 

[Murray]

DW can handle a full CSS layout in Design view much better than FP (i.e.,
one that uses all modes of positioning, floating, etc.). And DW's CSS
editing is MUCH easier and more flexible than FPs.

If all you are using CSS for is to style your text, then you will likely not
find much difference between the two.

 

[JoeM]

Don't buy try first. http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/FX010858021033.aspx
Then Click Free: Try FrontPage 2003

 

[KatWoman]

It's a good question. I use FP because you don't really need to know the
HTML code for everything. It is nice to know enough to hand edit some of the
weirdness FP sometimes generates. FP is easier to learn and the templates
make it very easy. That said FP is not a very artistic looking program. I
think it is very good for people with no art or design skills. I tend to
customize my themes to get a nicer graphical look. If your server is not
running FP extensions you can lose some of the features.

DW is more of a blank slate. if you don't know a lot about design I don't
suggest it. Basically you start out with a blank slate. If you know how to
construct frames, make your own graphics, have good ftp skills, you may
prefer DW.

I keep promising myself I will learn it but just keep going to what I know
which is FP.

try before you buy is a good suggestion.....

OT: I am assuming top posting is the norm on this NG...I was told that is
impolite? should I be posting at the bottom of the questions?

 

[Thomas A. Rowe]

Top posting is the norm in this newsgroup.

--
==============================================
Thomas A. Rowe (Microsoft MVP - FrontPage)
==============================================
If you feel your current issue is a results of installing
a Service Pack or security update, please contact
Microsoft Product Support Services:
http://support.microsoft.com
If the problem can be shown to have been caused by a
security update, then there is usually no charge for the call.
==============================================

 

[Murray]

People who say it's impolite have too little to do.... 8)

 

[KatWoman]

well it seems they don't use MS Outlook for their newsreader, which defaults
to writing on top.
In my other NG the thread goes from top to bottom having the newest posts.
It is good to keep consistent one way or other so old threads can be read in
order.

 

[Rob Giordano \(Crash Gordon®\)]

top posting is faster...imo
Outlook doesn't have a newsreader


| well it seems they don't use MS Outlook for their newsreader, which defaults
| to writing on top.
| In my other NG the thread goes from top to bottom having the newest posts.
| It is good to keep consistent one way or other so old threads can be read in
| order.
|
|
| | > People who say it's impolite have too little to do.... 8)
| >
| > --
| > Murray
| > ============
| >
| > | >> It's a good question. I use FP because you don't really need to know the
| >> HTML code for everything. It is nice to know enough to hand edit some of
| >> the weirdness FP sometimes generates. FP is easier to learn and the
| >> templates make it very easy. That said FP is not a very artistic looking
| >> program. I think it is very good for people with no art or design skills.
| >> I tend to customize my themes to get a nicer graphical look. If your
| >> server is not running FP extensions you can lose some of the features.
| >>
| >> DW is more of a blank slate. if you don't know a lot about design I don't
| >> suggest it. Basically you start out with a blank slate. If you know how
| >> to construct frames, make your own graphics, have good ftp skills, you
| >> may prefer DW.
| >>
| >> I keep promising myself I will learn it but just keep going to what I
| >> know which is FP.
| >>
| >> try before you buy is a good suggestion.....
| >>
| >> OT: I am assuming top posting is the norm on this NG...I was told that is
| >> impolite? should I be posting at the bottom of the questions?
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >> | >>> Okay, I'm trying to make some websites for local companies. What I do
| >>> is, I
| >>> open notepad and just type up all the HTML from memory. I use
| >>> photo-editting
| >>> software along with scanned photos, etc, and make it all the old
| >>> fashioned
| >>> way. I don't do anything flashy (nor do I get paid to!) and like it's
| >>> always
| >>> been, oh, one website a month. Just for fun. Now I've actually got a
| >>> few
| >>> small (heavy emphasis there) businesses wanting me to make their
| >>> websites.
| >>> (Note that they do all the hosting, etc, I just make it look purty).
| >>>
| >>> I am starting to get tired of spending hours upon hours sitting in front
| >>> of
| >>> a computer and typing out the HTML language. Now, I know there's
| >>> software
| >>> out there to simplify this; I'm only a half-dunce. What I would like to
| >>> know
| >>> is, which is more "user friendly," Dreamweaver or Frontpage? I've read
| >>> reviews and they both sound nice, and I've asked some folks who use
| >>> Dreamweaver what they think about it and now I'd like to hear from you
| >>> Frontpage people. Is it easy to use? Is the user interface easy to
| >>> catch on
| >>> to? I'd rather not have to go out and buy both softwares, you know, but
| >>> like
| >>> I want the one that's going to give me the smallest migraine. Can
| >>> anyone
| >>> give me their opinions? I'd be eternally grateful. Thanks!
| >>
| >>
| >
| >
|
|

 

[Trevor L.]

Outlok Express does (have a newreader)

 

[Rob Giordano \(Crash Gordon®\)]

Outlook Express does but Outlook doesnt (not really anyway).
Mozilla has a pretty good one.

| Outlok Express does (have a newreader)
|
| --
| Cheers,
| Trevor L., WIP (Web Interested Person)
| Website: http://tandcl.homemail.com.au
|
| Rob Giordano (Crash Gordon®) wrote:
| > top posting is faster...imo
| > Outlook doesn't have a newsreader
| >
| >
| > | >> well it seems they don't use MS Outlook for their newsreader, which
| >> defaults to writing on top.
| >> In my other NG the thread goes from top to bottom having the newest
| >> posts. It is good to keep consistent one way or other so old threads
| >> can be read in order.
| >>
| >>
| >> | >>> People who say it's impolite have too little to do.... 8)
| >>>
| >>> --
| >>> Murray
| >>> ============
| >>>
| >>> | >>>> It's a good question. I use FP because you don't really need to
| >>>> know the HTML code for everything. It is nice to know enough to
| >>>> hand edit some of the weirdness FP sometimes generates. FP is
| >>>> easier to learn and the templates make it very easy. That said FP
| >>>> is not a very artistic looking program. I think it is very good
| >>>> for people with no art or design skills. I tend to customize my
| >>>> themes to get a nicer graphical look. If your server is not
| >>>> running FP extensions you can lose some of the features.
| >>>>
| >>>> DW is more of a blank slate. if you don't know a lot about design
| >>>> I don't suggest it. Basically you start out with a blank slate. If
| >>>> you know how to construct frames, make your own graphics, have
| >>>> good ftp skills, you may prefer DW.
| >>>>
| >>>> I keep promising myself I will learn it but just keep going to
| >>>> what I know which is FP.
| >>>>
| >>>> try before you buy is a good suggestion.....
| >>>>
| >>>> OT: I am assuming top posting is the norm on this NG...I was told
| >>>> that is impolite? should I be posting at the bottom of the
| >>>> questions?
| >>>>
| >>>>
| >>>>
| >>>> | >>>>> Okay, I'm trying to make some websites for local companies. What
| >>>>> I do is, I
| >>>>> open notepad and just type up all the HTML from memory. I use
| >>>>> photo-editting
| >>>>> software along with scanned photos, etc, and make it all the old
| >>>>> fashioned
| >>>>> way. I don't do anything flashy (nor do I get paid to!) and like
| >>>>> it's always
| >>>>> been, oh, one website a month. Just for fun. Now I've actually
| >>>>> got a few
| >>>>> small (heavy emphasis there) businesses wanting me to make their
| >>>>> websites.
| >>>>> (Note that they do all the hosting, etc, I just make it look
| >>>>> purty).
| >>>>>
| >>>>> I am starting to get tired of spending hours upon hours sitting
| >>>>> in front of
| >>>>> a computer and typing out the HTML language. Now, I know there's
| >>>>> software
| >>>>> out there to simplify this; I'm only a half-dunce. What I would
| >>>>> like to know
| >>>>> is, which is more "user friendly," Dreamweaver or Frontpage?
| >>>>> I've read reviews and they both sound nice, and I've asked some
| >>>>> folks who use Dreamweaver what they think about it and now I'd
| >>>>> like to hear from you Frontpage people. Is it easy to use? Is
| >>>>> the user interface easy to catch on
| >>>>> to? I'd rather not have to go out and buy both softwares, you
| >>>>> know, but like
| >>>>> I want the one that's going to give me the smallest migraine. Can
| >>>>> anyone
| >>>>> give me their opinions? I'd be eternally grateful. Thanks!
|
|

 

[Andrew Murray]

I'd say Frontpage is better for the beginniner. Dreamweaver is aimed more
toward the pro, although the pro's would tell you nothing beats Notepad...!

 

[Andrew Murray]

I know a little about graphic design, a bit of html, and so on....I just
bought FP because it doesn't have the pricetag of Dreamweaver (actually
about 1/3 of the price of DW).

Dreamweaver MX 2004 = $600-700 $Australian
Frontpage 2003 = $245-350 $Australian

 

[Murray]

OE is what Outlook uses as a Newsreader.

--
Murray
============

message Outlook Express does but Outlook doesnt (not really anyway).
Mozilla has a pretty good one.

| Outlok Express does (have a newreader)
|
| --
| Cheers,
| Trevor L., WIP (Web Interested Person)
| Website: http://tandcl.homemail.com.au
|
| Rob Giordano (Crash Gordon®) wrote:
| > top posting is faster...imo
| > Outlook doesn't have a newsreader
| >
| >
| > | >> well it seems they don't use MS Outlook for their newsreader, which
| >> defaults to writing on top.
| >> In my other NG the thread goes from top to bottom having the newest
| >> posts. It is good to keep consistent one way or other so old threads
| >> can be read in order.
| >>
| >>
| >> | >>> People who say it's impolite have too little to do.... 8)
| >>>
| >>> --
| >>> Murray
| >>> ============
| >>>
| >>> | >>>> It's a good question. I use FP because you don't really need to
| >>>> know the HTML code for everything. It is nice to know enough to
| >>>> hand edit some of the weirdness FP sometimes generates. FP is
| >>>> easier to learn and the templates make it very easy. That said FP
| >>>> is not a very artistic looking program. I think it is very good
| >>>> for people with no art or design skills. I tend to customize my
| >>>> themes to get a nicer graphical look. If your server is not
| >>>> running FP extensions you can lose some of the features.
| >>>>
| >>>> DW is more of a blank slate. if you don't know a lot about design
| >>>> I don't suggest it. Basically you start out with a blank slate. If
| >>>> you know how to construct frames, make your own graphics, have
| >>>> good ftp skills, you may prefer DW.
| >>>>
| >>>> I keep promising myself I will learn it but just keep going to
| >>>> what I know which is FP.
| >>>>
| >>>> try before you buy is a good suggestion.....
| >>>>
| >>>> OT: I am assuming top posting is the norm on this NG...I was told
| >>>> that is impolite? should I be posting at the bottom of the
| >>>> questions?
| >>>>
| >>>>
| >>>>
| >>>> | >>>>> Okay, I'm trying to make some websites for local companies. What
| >>>>> I do is, I
| >>>>> open notepad and just type up all the HTML from memory. I use
| >>>>> photo-editting
| >>>>> software along with scanned photos, etc, and make it all the old
| >>>>> fashioned
| >>>>> way. I don't do anything flashy (nor do I get paid to!) and like
| >>>>> it's always
| >>>>> been, oh, one website a month. Just for fun. Now I've actually
| >>>>> got a few
| >>>>> small (heavy emphasis there) businesses wanting me to make their
| >>>>> websites.
| >>>>> (Note that they do all the hosting, etc, I just make it look
| >>>>> purty).
| >>>>>
| >>>>> I am starting to get tired of spending hours upon hours sitting
| >>>>> in front of
| >>>>> a computer and typing out the HTML language. Now, I know there's
| >>>>> software
| >>>>> out there to simplify this; I'm only a half-dunce. What I would
| >>>>> like to know
| >>>>> is, which is more "user friendly," Dreamweaver or Frontpage?
| >>>>> I've read reviews and they both sound nice, and I've asked some
| >>>>> folks who use Dreamweaver what they think about it and now I'd
| >>>>> like to hear from you Frontpage people. Is it easy to use? Is
| >>>>> the user interface easy to catch on
| >>>>> to? I'd rather not have to go out and buy both softwares, you
| >>>>> know, but like
| >>>>> I want the one that's going to give me the smallest migraine. Can
| >>>>> anyone
| >>>>> give me their opinions? I'd be eternally grateful. Thanks!
|
|

 

[Murray]

And the 'pros' would be wrong too.

I can run circles around Notepad with Dreamweaver.

 

[Tom Pepper Willett]

Outlook uses Outlook Express as the newsreader.
--
===
Tom "Pepper" Willett
Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
---
About FrontPage 2003:
http://office.microsoft.com/home/office.aspx?assetid=FX01085802
===
message Outlook Express does but Outlook doesnt (not really anyway).
Mozilla has a pretty good one.

| Outlok Express does (have a newreader)
|
| --
| Cheers,
| Trevor L., WIP (Web Interested Person)
| Website: http://tandcl.homemail.com.au
|
| Rob Giordano (Crash Gordon®) wrote:
| > top posting is faster...imo
| > Outlook doesn't have a newsreader
| >
| >
| > | >> well it seems they don't use MS Outlook for their newsreader, which
| >> defaults to writing on top.
| >> In my other NG the thread goes from top to bottom having the newest
| >> posts. It is good to keep consistent one way or other so old threads
| >> can be read in order.
| >>
| >>
| >> | >>> People who say it's impolite have too little to do.... 8)
| >>>
| >>> --
| >>> Murray
| >>> ============
| >>>
| >>> | >>>> It's a good question. I use FP because you don't really need to
| >>>> know the HTML code for everything. It is nice to know enough to
| >>>> hand edit some of the weirdness FP sometimes generates. FP is
| >>>> easier to learn and the templates make it very easy. That said FP
| >>>> is not a very artistic looking program. I think it is very good
| >>>> for people with no art or design skills. I tend to customize my
| >>>> themes to get a nicer graphical look. If your server is not
| >>>> running FP extensions you can lose some of the features.
| >>>>
| >>>> DW is more of a blank slate. if you don't know a lot about design
| >>>> I don't suggest it. Basically you start out with a blank slate. If
| >>>> you know how to construct frames, make your own graphics, have
| >>>> good ftp skills, you may prefer DW.
| >>>>
| >>>> I keep promising myself I will learn it but just keep going to
| >>>> what I know which is FP.
| >>>>
| >>>> try before you buy is a good suggestion.....
| >>>>
| >>>> OT: I am assuming top posting is the norm on this NG...I was told
| >>>> that is impolite? should I be posting at the bottom of the
| >>>> questions?
| >>>>
| >>>>
| >>>>
| >>>> | >>>>> Okay, I'm trying to make some websites for local companies. What
| >>>>> I do is, I
| >>>>> open notepad and just type up all the HTML from memory. I use
| >>>>> photo-editting
| >>>>> software along with scanned photos, etc, and make it all the old
| >>>>> fashioned
| >>>>> way. I don't do anything flashy (nor do I get paid to!) and like
| >>>>> it's always
| >>>>> been, oh, one website a month. Just for fun. Now I've actually
| >>>>> got a few
| >>>>> small (heavy emphasis there) businesses wanting me to make their
| >>>>> websites.
| >>>>> (Note that they do all the hosting, etc, I just make it look
| >>>>> purty).
| >>>>>
| >>>>> I am starting to get tired of spending hours upon hours sitting
| >>>>> in front of
| >>>>> a computer and typing out the HTML language. Now, I know there's
| >>>>> software
| >>>>> out there to simplify this; I'm only a half-dunce. What I would
| >>>>> like to know
| >>>>> is, which is more "user friendly," Dreamweaver or Frontpage?
| >>>>> I've read reviews and they both sound nice, and I've asked some
| >>>>> folks who use Dreamweaver what they think about it and now I'd
| >>>>> like to hear from you Frontpage people. Is it easy to use? Is
| >>>>> the user interface easy to catch on
| >>>>> to? I'd rather not have to go out and buy both softwares, you
| >>>>> know, but like
| >>>>> I want the one that's going to give me the smallest migraine. Can
| >>>>> anyone
| >>>>> give me their opinions? I'd be eternally grateful. Thanks!
|
|

 

[Rob Giordano \(Crash Gordon®\)]

yah, but its an awkward pass-through kinda thing.


| OE is what Outlook uses as a Newsreader.
|
| --
| Murray
| ============
|
| message | Outlook Express does but Outlook doesnt (not really anyway).
| Mozilla has a pretty good one.
|
| | | Outlok Express does (have a newreader)
| |
| | --
| | Cheers,
| | Trevor L., WIP (Web Interested Person)
| | Website: http://tandcl.homemail.com.au
| |
| | Rob Giordano (Crash Gordon®) wrote:
| | > top posting is faster...imo
| | > Outlook doesn't have a newsreader
| | >
| | >
| | > | | >> well it seems they don't use MS Outlook for their newsreader, which
| | >> defaults to writing on top.
| | >> In my other NG the thread goes from top to bottom having the newest
| | >> posts. It is good to keep consistent one way or other so old threads
| | >> can be read in order.
| | >>
| | >>
| | >> | | >>> People who say it's impolite have too little to do.... 8)
| | >>>
| | >>> --
| | >>> Murray
| | >>> ============
| | >>>
| | >>> | | >>>> It's a good question. I use FP because you don't really need to
| | >>>> know the HTML code for everything. It is nice to know enough to
| | >>>> hand edit some of the weirdness FP sometimes generates. FP is
| | >>>> easier to learn and the templates make it very easy. That said FP
| | >>>> is not a very artistic looking program. I think it is very good
| | >>>> for people with no art or design skills. I tend to customize my
| | >>>> themes to get a nicer graphical look. If your server is not
| | >>>> running FP extensions you can lose some of the features.
| | >>>>
| | >>>> DW is more of a blank slate. if you don't know a lot about design
| | >>>> I don't suggest it. Basically you start out with a blank slate. If
| | >>>> you know how to construct frames, make your own graphics, have
| | >>>> good ftp skills, you may prefer DW.
| | >>>>
| | >>>> I keep promising myself I will learn it but just keep going to
| | >>>> what I know which is FP.
| | >>>>
| | >>>> try before you buy is a good suggestion.....
| | >>>>
| | >>>> OT: I am assuming top posting is the norm on this NG...I was told
| | >>>> that is impolite? should I be posting at the bottom of the
| | >>>> questions?
| | >>>>
| | >>>>
| | >>>>
| | >>>> | | >>>>> Okay, I'm trying to make some websites for local companies. What
| | >>>>> I do is, I
| | >>>>> open notepad and just type up all the HTML from memory. I use
| | >>>>> photo-editting
| | >>>>> software along with scanned photos, etc, and make it all the old
| | >>>>> fashioned
| | >>>>> way. I don't do anything flashy (nor do I get paid to!) and like
| | >>>>> it's always
| | >>>>> been, oh, one website a month. Just for fun. Now I've actually
| | >>>>> got a few
| | >>>>> small (heavy emphasis there) businesses wanting me to make their
| | >>>>> websites.
| | >>>>> (Note that they do all the hosting, etc, I just make it look
| | >>>>> purty).
| | >>>>>
| | >>>>> I am starting to get tired of spending hours upon hours sitting
| | >>>>> in front of
| | >>>>> a computer and typing out the HTML language. Now, I know there's
| | >>>>> software
| | >>>>> out there to simplify this; I'm only a half-dunce. What I would
| | >>>>> like to know
| | >>>>> is, which is more "user friendly," Dreamweaver or Frontpage?
| | >>>>> I've read reviews and they both sound nice, and I've asked some
| | >>>>> folks who use Dreamweaver what they think about it and now I'd
| | >>>>> like to hear from you Frontpage people. Is it easy to use? Is
| | >>>>> the user interface easy to catch on
| | >>>>> to? I'd rather not have to go out and buy both softwares, you
| | >>>>> know, but like
| | >>>>> I want the one that's going to give me the smallest migraine. Can
| | >>>>> anyone
| | >>>>> give me their opinions? I'd be eternally grateful. Thanks!
| |
| |
|
|

 

[Murray]

That it is....

--
Murray
============

message yah, but its an awkward pass-through kinda thing.


| OE is what Outlook uses as a Newsreader.
|
| --
| Murray
| ============
|
| message | Outlook Express does but Outlook doesnt (not really anyway).
| Mozilla has a pretty good one.
|
| | | Outlok Express does (have a newreader)
| |
| | --
| | Cheers,
| | Trevor L., WIP (Web Interested Person)
| | Website: http://tandcl.homemail.com.au
| |
| | Rob Giordano (Crash Gordon®) wrote:
| | > top posting is faster...imo
| | > Outlook doesn't have a newsreader
| | >
| | >
| | > | | >> well it seems they don't use MS Outlook for their newsreader, which
| | >> defaults to writing on top.
| | >> In my other NG the thread goes from top to bottom having the newest
| | >> posts. It is good to keep consistent one way or other so old threads
| | >> can be read in order.
| | >>
| | >>
| | >> | | >>> People who say it's impolite have too little to do.... 8)
| | >>>
| | >>> --
| | >>> Murray
| | >>> ============
| | >>>
| | >>> | | >>>> It's a good question. I use FP because you don't really need to
| | >>>> know the HTML code for everything. It is nice to know enough to
| | >>>> hand edit some of the weirdness FP sometimes generates. FP is
| | >>>> easier to learn and the templates make it very easy. That said FP
| | >>>> is not a very artistic looking program. I think it is very good
| | >>>> for people with no art or design skills. I tend to customize my
| | >>>> themes to get a nicer graphical look. If your server is not
| | >>>> running FP extensions you can lose some of the features.
| | >>>>
| | >>>> DW is more of a blank slate. if you don't know a lot about design
| | >>>> I don't suggest it. Basically you start out with a blank slate. If
| | >>>> you know how to construct frames, make your own graphics, have
| | >>>> good ftp skills, you may prefer DW.
| | >>>>
| | >>>> I keep promising myself I will learn it but just keep going to
| | >>>> what I know which is FP.
| | >>>>
| | >>>> try before you buy is a good suggestion.....
| | >>>>
| | >>>> OT: I am assuming top posting is the norm on this NG...I was told
| | >>>> that is impolite? should I be posting at the bottom of the
| | >>>> questions?
| | >>>>
| | >>>>
| | >>>>
| | >>>> | | >>>>> Okay, I'm trying to make some websites for local companies. What
| | >>>>> I do is, I
| | >>>>> open notepad and just type up all the HTML from memory. I use
| | >>>>> photo-editting
| | >>>>> software along with scanned photos, etc, and make it all the old
| | >>>>> fashioned
| | >>>>> way. I don't do anything flashy (nor do I get paid to!) and like
| | >>>>> it's always
| | >>>>> been, oh, one website a month. Just for fun. Now I've actually
| | >>>>> got a few
| | >>>>> small (heavy emphasis there) businesses wanting me to make their
| | >>>>> websites.
| | >>>>> (Note that they do all the hosting, etc, I just make it look
| | >>>>> purty).
| | >>>>>
| | >>>>> I am starting to get tired of spending hours upon hours sitting
| | >>>>> in front of
| | >>>>> a computer and typing out the HTML language. Now, I know there's
| | >>>>> software
| | >>>>> out there to simplify this; I'm only a half-dunce. What I would
| | >>>>> like to know
| | >>>>> is, which is more "user friendly," Dreamweaver or Frontpage?
| | >>>>> I've read reviews and they both sound nice, and I've asked some
| | >>>>> folks who use Dreamweaver what they think about it and now I'd
| | >>>>> like to hear from you Frontpage people. Is it easy to use? Is
| | >>>>> the user interface easy to catch on
| | >>>>> to? I'd rather not have to go out and buy both softwares, you
| | >>>>> know, but like
| | >>>>> I want the one that's going to give me the smallest migraine. Can
| | >>>>> anyone
| | >>>>> give me their opinions? I'd be eternally grateful. Thanks!
| |
| |
|
|