L
Lara
I got a new job, where one quite simple Access DB was placed onto the server
with shortcuts of the whole! DB being placed onto app 5 PCs.
Of course one of the first things I did, was to split the DB and have only
the backend on the server, and the frontend on the PCs with a shortcut to the
desktop.
Now the DB itself is still opening reasonalby well, but some of the forms
take up to 1 minute, whereas the same form would open within one second when
I tested it again with the whole DB back on the server.
This happens even when no one else is using it, when I am the only user.
When I enquired if it was actually possible to use a whole DB simultaneously
by several people directly from the server, (because it had never occured to
me to set up a system that way) the staff swore to me, that yes, even a whole
DB can be used simultaneously by more than one person.
It occured to me that maybe the speed of the network is not great, because
the company I am working for uses currently 3 different residential houses
adjacent to each other, so I thought the cabling might cause a problem, but
this still does not explaint why an unsplit DB should work so much faster
than a split one.
Any ideas - I'd be so greatful!
Thanks, Lara
with shortcuts of the whole! DB being placed onto app 5 PCs.
Of course one of the first things I did, was to split the DB and have only
the backend on the server, and the frontend on the PCs with a shortcut to the
desktop.
Now the DB itself is still opening reasonalby well, but some of the forms
take up to 1 minute, whereas the same form would open within one second when
I tested it again with the whole DB back on the server.
This happens even when no one else is using it, when I am the only user.
When I enquired if it was actually possible to use a whole DB simultaneously
by several people directly from the server, (because it had never occured to
me to set up a system that way) the staff swore to me, that yes, even a whole
DB can be used simultaneously by more than one person.
It occured to me that maybe the speed of the network is not great, because
the company I am working for uses currently 3 different residential houses
adjacent to each other, so I thought the cabling might cause a problem, but
this still does not explaint why an unsplit DB should work so much faster
than a split one.
Any ideas - I'd be so greatful!
Thanks, Lara