M
M Swift
Regarding birthdays, in many cases, the only information one has, or that is
relevant, is the day of the year, not the year itself. Outlook 2007 cannot
accommodate this case; it must assign a year in a Contact's birthday field.
To record birthdays without a year, I could choose a flag year such as 1900,
which would mean "year unknown" to me, but of course this solution is
misleading to anyone who doesn't know the convention. It would be much
cleaner if Outlook would simply offer and allow a null value for the year.
----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...616655ef&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.contacts
relevant, is the day of the year, not the year itself. Outlook 2007 cannot
accommodate this case; it must assign a year in a Contact's birthday field.
To record birthdays without a year, I could choose a flag year such as 1900,
which would mean "year unknown" to me, but of course this solution is
misleading to anyone who doesn't know the convention. It would be much
cleaner if Outlook would simply offer and allow a null value for the year.
----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...616655ef&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.contacts