As I said: because the formatting is stored IN the paragraph mark
If you have a paragraph in TNR, and one in Arial, and you delete the
paragraph mark between them; the text that was in the first paragraph mark
gets the formatting stored in the next closest paragraph mark BELOW it.
So it becomes Arial
The confusion happens because of a kludge they installed to try to make it
less confusing. What used to happen was that when you deleted the paragraph
mark, the formatting was copied "backwards", so it was the "down wind"
paragraph that changed.
That confused the hell out of some people. So they installed this
Heath-Robinson kludge where Word first moves the formatting from the first
paragraph to the second paragraph mark, then deletes the paragraph mark.
The hard-and-fast "rule" all over Word is that the "properties" of an object
are stored in its "terminating character".
So: The terminating character of a paragraph is the paragraph mark, and it
stores a pointer to the formatting for that paragraph mark. The actual
formatting properties are stored in the style table at the end of the
document. Whether the formatting is done with a style or not. All
formatting in Word is a style behind the scenes.
The terminating character of a section is the section break, and it stores
all of the page properties associated with that section, such as paper size
and margin widths.
The terminating character for a document is invisible: it sits just below
the final paragraph mark, outside the "document", and thus you can't see it.
It stores thousands and thousands of properties: all of the formatting, all
of the pictures... Basically everything in the document that is not "text".
Which is why when we do a "Maggie" and copy everything EXCEPT the last
paragraph mark, we manage to fix most document problems. That manoeuvre
copies the "text" into a document that has a pristine uncorrupted property
container. Word rebuilds the properties, retaining only those that apply to
the copied text, and the document is fixed.
Cheers
Thanks CT,
That's a big improvement. But I'm still at a loss as to underlying
problems. Any suggestions for where to start looking for better
understanding?
regards, B
--
Don't wait for your answer, click here:
http://www.word.mvps.org/
Please reply in the group. Please do NOT email me unless I ask you to.
John McGhie, Microsoft MVP, Word and Word:Mac
Sydney, Australia. mailto:
[email protected]