BCC limitation?

[R_CAxcelis]

In Microsoft Outlook 2003 - if you add ~>70 recipients to the BCC (blind
copy) field of an outgoing message, when you go back to review the sent
message (in sent items) it will not display all the blind copied recipients
in the BCC field. Based on the message byte size you can tell the data is
embedded, however it doesn't show up in the BCC field. Does Outlook 2007
resolve this bug?

 

[VanguardLH]

in message

In Microsoft Outlook 2003 - if you add ~>70 recipients to the BCC
(blind
copy) field of an outgoing message, when you go back to review the
sent
message (in sent items) it will not display all the blind copied
recipients
in the BCC field. Based on the message byte size you can tell the
data is
embedded, however it doesn't show up in the BCC field. Does Outlook
2007
resolve this bug?

You sure you cannot scroll through the Bcc string? Click on the Bcc
header field in the opened e-mail copy of your sent message. Then use
the left or right arrow keys to move around. If the cursor hits the
edge of the window when moving the cursor within the Bcc field, does
not the string move to show you more?

 

[Duncan McC]

In Microsoft Outlook 2003 - if you add ~>70 recipients to the BCC (blind
copy) field of an outgoing message, when you go back to review the sent
message (in sent items) it will not display all the blind copied recipients
in the BCC field. Based on the message byte size you can tell the data is
embedded, however it doesn't show up in the BCC field. Does Outlook 2007
resolve this bug?

In addition to 'VanguardLH' - can I suggest you never email more than 50
recipients per email?

Many servers or filters will reject emails with too many recipients.
eg. on all the networks I maintain that run Exchange Server and Sophos
PureMessage (email antivirus), I set the max recipients per email to 60.