It is set to High. Please clarify what you mean by 'get rid of'? I think you
mean it goes to the Junk folder? So I'll expound on that. See, I thought
about that too, it all goes to the junk folder and bam! not in the Inbox.
But when you think about it. All that is doing is moving the SPAM from one
folder to another. In the Junk folder, you still have to go through the
process of scrolling down the list, making sure a legitimate email isn't in
there, while deleting the SPAM. Really no difference if the SPAM was in the
Inbox; Same process, different folder.
By creating specific rules to Permanently Delete words or phrases that you
KNOW will always be SPAM emails, then they are eradicated, and you never
know you got them. My goal is to get my SPAM down to just a few a day. Well,
actually none, but dream on, right. When I look hard enough, I see
commonalities, and set rules to permanently delete. One trick I see the scum
using is putting multiple .... by the word, making the ....part of the word.
This makes if difficult to filter. So what I did, I created a rule with
about 25 words, each having 1, 2 and 3 periods. The other one is M.0rtg.age
and the like. This makes it very difficult to filter.
It would be great for Microsoft to add the option to delete emails with
"specific letters in a word" and delete emails with two or more ..(periods),
or dashes or colons, etc. in the word. Can you imagine how many emails we
could eradicate before they ever hit our box with those rules.
It's obvious, the scum is getting both more clever and desperate at the same
time. By adding periods and dashes to their words and sending emails with
nothing but a .gif picture in the body. It shows we are having an impact on
them.
You said you keep images off. Ok. Lets say you get a legitimate email from
Microsoft in HTML with links to new programs, partner programs, upcoming
seminars etc. If something interests you, you click the link and go. But, if
it's plain text, the HTML is just text, rendering the email useless, or if
you read HTML language, it becomes an extreme hassle to locate the links,
cut and paste them etc.. And by doing this, you are still getting the SPAM
email, that you can set rules to permanently delete, but you are robbing
yourself of the legitimate HTML ones. Is this not so?
Diane Poremsky said:
Why not just use junk mail set on high? it gets rid of 99% of my spam
without additional rules or adding names to blocked senders. Use autoarchive
to delete items from the junk filter every few days or browse it for good
mail and right click, empty.
It takes less time to hit Del than it does to create rules that only apply
to a few messages, so I don't mind deleting a handful of spams a day when
the vast majority are moved to junk mail by the High setting - as long as
the images aren't downloaded.
I've never seen this spam myself, but I keep images off - or maybe I'm on
the wrong spammers lists.
Or the high setting dumps it for me... but I
recommend not allowing downloaded content by default and not trusting names
in your address book. (Most people keep their contact in contacts and many
spammers send from "you", so images are shown.) Add addresses to the safe
senders list if you want to see some images - otherwise it takes a
second
to
enable them per message.
--
Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
Author, Teach Yourself Outlook 2003 in 24 Hours
http://www.poremsky.com -
http://www.cdolive.com
Expert Zone
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
Search for answers:
http://groups.google.com
Most recent posts to the Outlook newsgroups:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_ugroup=microsoft.public.outlook.*&num=30