M
manning.61
I'm working with an inherited Access DB with 5-10 concurrent users.
There is no backend and it sits in a folder on a file server. It has
bound forms (opened with where clause), and access security. A remote
user "crashed the db and corrupted a record". After deleting the
record and repairing and compacting the db, it worked, but I'd rather
avoid this problem. If I split the db to front end\back end (both in
access) and have users download a FE to their pc, should that help the
problem, or would I need to do that and use unbound forms to improve
performance (it is slow)? I'm assuming that an SQL Server BE and
Access FE would be a truly stable solution, right? I'm an experienced
user and write some code, but I don't know much about networks and
performance. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
There is no backend and it sits in a folder on a file server. It has
bound forms (opened with where clause), and access security. A remote
user "crashed the db and corrupted a record". After deleting the
record and repairing and compacting the db, it worked, but I'd rather
avoid this problem. If I split the db to front end\back end (both in
access) and have users download a FE to their pc, should that help the
problem, or would I need to do that and use unbound forms to improve
performance (it is slow)? I'm assuming that an SQL Server BE and
Access FE would be a truly stable solution, right? I'm an experienced
user and write some code, but I don't know much about networks and
performance. Any thoughts would be appreciated.