Bug in BCM email history, once email deleted

G

George

Here's another bug (sort of) in Outlook2003w/BCM that, if corrected in the
next version (or if someone has a workaround for now) would make the product
better, more useful, and less time consuming/difficult to use for meaninful
business purposes.

When you send/receive an email with attachments, and manually or
"automatically" link it to a BCM contact, it stores in the contact's history
the email, which of course (if double clicked) displays the email and
attachments (initially). You can even click on them to open them.

The problems arise once you *delete* the email from your in/sent box AND
permanently from your "deleted items" box. Here are problems--It would be
great to get these fixed and/or improved:

---------------------

PROBLEM #1. ATTACHMENT EVAPORATES AND NO RECORD OF FILENAME. First, it
understandably deletes the attachment... big attachments would eventualy
fill up the hard drive. Besides, if you attached it, you probably have it
somewhere else on your PC. *But* for a given email, we at least need a
"record" that there *was* an attachment and *preferably* the filename...
like this...

2/25/05
Sent to: (e-mail address removed)
Subject: March meeting
Attachments: AGENDA.doc 180KB 1/1/05 <-----------

The only way around this it seems is to add a new "Note" next to the email,
and manually type in the name of the attachment you sent. Or manually
attach the whole file in BCM history. Extra work, wasted space.

-------------------

PROBLEM #2. FORMATTING FALLS APART. If you sent the email (or received it)
in html format, as many people do... once it's permanently deleted from
in/sent/deleted box, BCM's *history* retains a version of the email that
suddenly has lots of white rows (spacing) between text...apparently because
history uses plain text, which doesn't deal with the "former" html of the
email. This makes it hard to read, like this:
2/25/05
Sent to: (e-mail address removed)
Subject: March meeting


Hello Joe,


We are all confirmed for the big conference in Miami.


XYZ will roll out the new product on the first day.


Sincerely


George


Chicago Division


(312) 555-1212
 
S

Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]

I agree that these are problems, but they're not bugs, they're design flaws.
The program is working as designed. The history database table stores a
pointer to the original email message along with the plain text message
body, subject, etc. If you delete the original message, all that remains is
that database record.
 
G

George

Thank you Sue, agreed, they're design flaws, hopefully the user feedback
will be helpful to improve the product.
George
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top