A
Art H
I've read many posts regarding Word 97, 2000, and 2002 and CacheSize.
I've experimented with Word 97 and Word 2000 getting increased
performance with larger values of CacheSize and BitMapMemory. Of
course, the performance increase is observed with larger files.
The article at http://support.microsoft.com/kb/820917/ implies that
Word 2003 does not use CacheSize or BitMapMemory, but then again,
Support.dot for Word 2003 (11) creates options under a registry path
containing 10.0 instead of 11.0.
What I don't see and what experimentation seems to indicate is that
Word 2003--my current version--does not use CacheSize and BitMapMemory.
Does anyone have knowledge that contradicts my findings for Word 2003
and/or are there other registry data items that one may adjust to
improve Word 2003's performance?
I've experimented with Word 97 and Word 2000 getting increased
performance with larger values of CacheSize and BitMapMemory. Of
course, the performance increase is observed with larger files.
The article at http://support.microsoft.com/kb/820917/ implies that
Word 2003 does not use CacheSize or BitMapMemory, but then again,
Support.dot for Word 2003 (11) creates options under a registry path
containing 10.0 instead of 11.0.
What I don't see and what experimentation seems to indicate is that
Word 2003--my current version--does not use CacheSize and BitMapMemory.
Does anyone have knowledge that contradicts my findings for Word 2003
and/or are there other registry data items that one may adjust to
improve Word 2003's performance?