Some of us are bit more forgiving of minor mistakes, especially when we
already know what is being referenced.
FWIW, I just received one of the checks I am owed for Technical Editing and
Proofing several of the new Outlook books that will be hitting the shelves
about now. Guess being a paid editor/proofer does not qualify me to chide
people in the public groups about mistakes?
--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact.
After searching google.groups.com and finding not answer:
Perdita X. Dream <
[email protected]> asked:
| Bob Buckland ?
wrote:
|| Hi Milly,
||
|| While the OEM copies do not qualify for the MS Retail
|| Technology Guarantee, the PC suppliers may be offering
|| an upgrade separately.
||
|| =========
|| message See this page
|| for details:
||
http://www.microsoft.com/office/preview/techguarantee.asp
||
|| It specifies that OEM copies of Office XP do not qualify.
||
|| Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook] >>
|
| And you all appear to have missed the fact that he was a version
| ahead of everyone else! ;o) I wouldn't employ you as proof readers!
|
| Cass
|
|
| --
| Perdita X. Dream
|
| Please help us to help you
|
http://groups.google.com
|
http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
|
| Please note that the reply address is fake.
| Keep all posts to the groups as private requests for assistance
| (i.e. email/IM) cannot be acknowledged. Thank you.