telicalbook said:
Hi,
I've been told that Publisher can't really format professional
books and to try a Tex variation.
Wondering about opinions on this. I don't want people to be able
to distinguish any difference between a book I publish and
any other book in a bookstore.
Also, what version of Publisher is recomended for this? I am
using one for Win95 and it can't suppress headers on final pages,
which makes for stupid looking end pages. Do later versions have
significant improvements for the book publisher and what are they?
Thanks for your help.
Robert
I used Publisher 95 to produce a book which was sold by a
mainstream publisher. The book was in landscape format with
double columns of text, on account of it containing loads of
tables. The tables were generated automatically by VB programs
which incorporated "<T>" tags between the values in each row.
These were copied and pasted into Publisher and the tags
substituted with tabs using "^t". Using tabs, left, right, centre,
decimal, (set within styles) in Publisher has to be the easiest
way of laying out tables ever. Far easier than the inbuilt table
editors in Publisher or Pagemaker IMO.
Each chapter formed a separate file and all were written to the
default imagesetter as Postcript EPS (IIRR) files. All these files
were then proofed to a S/H Laserjet IIIP with a Postscript cartridge
using DOS COPY. They were then sent direct to the printer and all
printed perfectly.
There are workarounds for most problems in Publisher, with master pages
and other features - as has been pointed out white boxes can be used to
obscure unwanted headers. The only real deficiency in Publisher 95
at least as compared with Pagemaker which I found, was the inability
to apply fine adjustments to the width of the type - tracking - with
just the one or two options "squeeze together" etc. and the leading.
Which would have been useful in order to maintain a consistent page
length on facing pages, given the preponderance of tables. While the
auto-hyphenation and word breaks also needed watching.
And clearly Publisher 95 isn't as adept at handling ligatures
and suchlike - which don't even show up in the index. But even then
having too much scope for fine tuning and fiddling, unless the
intention is to produce cutting-edge typographical masterpieces,
can be a handicap in itself.
The fonts used were the old Type 1 standbyes of Bookman for the
body text, and helvetica variants for the tables.
anon