P
Peg via AccessMonster.com
I am creating a student directory where I have data in canshrink and cangrow
txtboxes next to and under image. The report is a 2-column report, so output
is something like this:
txtbox1 -------------------------- txtbox1
--------------------------
txtbox2 | |
txtbox2 | |
txtbox3 | |
txtbox3 | |
txtbox4 | |
txtbox4 | |
txtbox5 | |
txtbox5 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---------------------------
--------------------------
txtbox6
txtbox6
txtbox7
txtbox7
The txtboxes next to the picture will, in most cases, grow past the bottom of
the image.
My problem is that the text under the image is pushed down, leaving a lot of
white space under the image before printing the text. This happens even when
the side txtboxes do not extend past the bottom of the image. I thought it
was caused by the cangrow of the last txtbox next to the image, so I have
tried making that txtbox height to extend past the bottom of the image - did
not resolve problem. I have also tried making all the side txtboxes heights
almost zero - did not resolve problem.
Any suggestions?
Thanks.
txtboxes next to and under image. The report is a 2-column report, so output
is something like this:
txtbox1 -------------------------- txtbox1
--------------------------
txtbox2 | |
txtbox2 | |
txtbox3 | |
txtbox3 | |
txtbox4 | |
txtbox4 | |
txtbox5 | |
txtbox5 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---------------------------
--------------------------
txtbox6
txtbox6
txtbox7
txtbox7
The txtboxes next to the picture will, in most cases, grow past the bottom of
the image.
My problem is that the text under the image is pushed down, leaving a lot of
white space under the image before printing the text. This happens even when
the side txtboxes do not extend past the bottom of the image. I thought it
was caused by the cangrow of the last txtbox next to the image, so I have
tried making that txtbox height to extend past the bottom of the image - did
not resolve problem. I have also tried making all the side txtboxes heights
almost zero - did not resolve problem.
Any suggestions?
Thanks.