Well, you're getting a little beyond my area of expertise here
On a Unicode system, for this issue, it really does not matter which fonts
you do or do not have, provided that at least one font contains the
character you are looking for.
On a Windows system, most folks install Arial Unicode MS, which acts as a
"lender of last resort" to all the other fonts. It was an attempt by
Microsoft to create one font that would contain ALL the characters possible.
That effort was going well up until Unicode 3.2, when there were less than
32,767 characters. We're now up to Unicode 5-something, and there's more
than 60,000 characters.
Arial Unicode MS is 24 Megabytes, and the number of compromises to character
shape needed to get it down to that size are considerable. So it has not
grown any recently.
I always drop a copy on my Mac, just so I never get caught wanting a
character I don't have. Given that all my Windows OSes are also on this
Mac, I don't have to move it "far"...
I would be surprised if "anyone" uses the default font any more. Since
about Word 2003, there has not actually BEEN such a concept as a default
font in Microsoft Word. In versions of Word later than 2003, the "Normal"
style is completely "empty", and the suggestion is that we leave it that
way, so it can inherit its settings from the document Theme.
In Word 2010 I notice there are now a set of "Document Defaults" you can
set, but I haven't investigated yet to see what is in them, or what they do.
Times and Times New Roman, as I am sure you know, were commissioned by the
London Times as a way to cram the most possible words on a piece of paper,
back when newsprint was very expensive and readers had plenty of time to
peer at a newspaper with a magnifying glass. It was an ugly font when it
was invented, and time has not been kind to it.
Most corporate documents these days are never printed (or at least, are
never "consumed" on paper). Times New Roman looks really disgusting on
screen.
Thus Microsoft commissioned two new fonts, one to replace Arial (Calibri)
and one to replace Times New Roman (Cambria). Both have the benefit of the
learning that has continued since the London Times invented TNR. Those who
know much more about fonts than I do suggest that both are elegant pieces of
craftsmanship (which, given the Adobe-centric leanings of most typographers,
surprised me...).
However, they both contain advanced typography such as proper ligatures and
hanging punctuation. Both contain the WGL4 glyph set, which is much wider
than Times New Roman (more characters). And both have much better support
for non-English characters.
So they look better, they work better, and everyone has them. So I use
them, and I recommend them.
I suspect that your issue may have more to do with the document itself than
the fonts on your system. If the document was constructed with a
non-Unicode encoding system, then you have to have the fonts specified in
the document on the system, or you don't get the character. It is also
quite possible to run into documents coded in Unicode that make extensive
use of the "Private Use Area". No rules in there: the font vendor can do
whatever they like. The "Apple" symbol is a case in point: it's a Private
Use Area character: it does appear in some Windows fonts, but whether you
see it or not in a document depends rather on which Apple font it was
inserted from.
Anyway, I can't help you. I suspect that if you switch the font in those
documents to SimSun, you'll get your characters. If you have the Microsoft
fonts offered by Office 2008 installed, I think you'll get your characters.
More than that, I can't really say
Hope this helps
A couple of other observations:
My PC has both English Windows XP (partition F) and Chinese XP installed
(partition C). Office 2007 is installed on C. A search for "fonts" on C finds
only the C:\Windows\Fonts. In that, among others, are these fonts:
times.ttf, timesbd.ttf, timesbi.ttf, and times.si.ttf
At F:\Windows\Fonts are none of these (by name). But if I drag any of those
from the C Fonts folder to the F Fonts folder, I get "The Times New Roman Bold
[or whatever] is already installed...". That makes me think these Chinese
fonts, although thought by the Windows system to be identical to the Times New
Roman family installed by the English Windows installer, may actually have
some different properties, and maybe I want those properties in the English
versions of Windows, OS 10.4, and OS 10.5. Any thoughts on that?
--
The email below is my business email -- Please do not email me about forum
matters unless I ask you to; or unless you intend to pay!
John McGhie, Microsoft MVP (Word, Mac Word), Consultant Technical Writer,
McGhie Information Engineering Pty Ltd
Sydney, Australia. | Ph: +61 (0)4 1209 1410 | mailto:
[email protected]