D
Dave
Hello, helpful people!
I have a reporting dashboard built in Excel that has eight mini-charts
on an overview sheet, arranged in two rows of four. The columns
containing the charts are 30 units wide; the rows are 175 units high.
There are 2.5 unit-wide "gutters" between the charts. I'm using Excel
V.X SR1.
As the dashboard evolves, we may add or delete mini-charts. It may be
necessary to have 4 on one row and 3 on the next, with the bottom row
centered under the upper row ... who knows what the client will want.
I imagined that I could redo the overview sheet as a boatload of
2.5-unit-wide columns, and have the charts span 12 columns for a total
of 30 units.
12 x 2.5 = 30, but twelve 2.5-unit-width columns is actually 39.17
units wide.
I'm just guessing that the gridlines have something to do with it.
Any suggestions?
PS: I know that one way to achieve something like this is by using the
"Camera" tool. Let's leave that aside for the moment, because I'm not
too happy with the fuzzy anti-aliased look of the camera tool's images.
PPS: I have strenuously avoided mentioning merged cells here, because
in researching this issue, I have seen several people who would not use
merged cells unless their life depended on it, and then ony after some
considerable thought...
I have a reporting dashboard built in Excel that has eight mini-charts
on an overview sheet, arranged in two rows of four. The columns
containing the charts are 30 units wide; the rows are 175 units high.
There are 2.5 unit-wide "gutters" between the charts. I'm using Excel
V.X SR1.
As the dashboard evolves, we may add or delete mini-charts. It may be
necessary to have 4 on one row and 3 on the next, with the bottom row
centered under the upper row ... who knows what the client will want.
I imagined that I could redo the overview sheet as a boatload of
2.5-unit-wide columns, and have the charts span 12 columns for a total
of 30 units.
12 x 2.5 = 30, but twelve 2.5-unit-width columns is actually 39.17
units wide.
I'm just guessing that the gridlines have something to do with it.
Any suggestions?
PS: I know that one way to achieve something like this is by using the
"Camera" tool. Let's leave that aside for the moment, because I'm not
too happy with the fuzzy anti-aliased look of the camera tool's images.
PPS: I have strenuously avoided mentioning merged cells here, because
in researching this issue, I have seen several people who would not use
merged cells unless their life depended on it, and then ony after some
considerable thought...