R
RJB
I'm working with copies of someone else's SAP files.
Machine operators enter "Notifications" into SAP, which schedulers
turn into "Work Orders".
After the job is complete, there is a row of data for each time anyone
- operator, scheduler, mechanic, etc. - made a change to the record.
Notifications have distinct numbers, as do work orders.
So you may have:
NOTIFICATION | WORK ORDER | ACTIVITY
0001 | 2985 | Notified pump out
0001 | 2985 | Scheduled work
0001 | 2985 | Calibrated pump
0001 | 2985 | Caliper post on first grid armature adjusted to three
0001 | 2985 | Lubed
0001 | 2985 | Closed with comments
A vast majority of the time, ONE notification will lead to ONE AND
ONLY ONE work order. There are SOME notifications that lead to two (or
more) work orders.
I need to find a way to highlight those that lead to two or more.
The best I could come up with was:
- Sort
- Do a lookup (which would return the FIRST work order associated with
that)
- Have a column, IF LOOKUP = WORK ORDER, 0, 1
- Sort on that 1
But that seems clunky and inaccurate.
Thanks
Machine operators enter "Notifications" into SAP, which schedulers
turn into "Work Orders".
After the job is complete, there is a row of data for each time anyone
- operator, scheduler, mechanic, etc. - made a change to the record.
Notifications have distinct numbers, as do work orders.
So you may have:
NOTIFICATION | WORK ORDER | ACTIVITY
0001 | 2985 | Notified pump out
0001 | 2985 | Scheduled work
0001 | 2985 | Calibrated pump
0001 | 2985 | Caliper post on first grid armature adjusted to three
0001 | 2985 | Lubed
0001 | 2985 | Closed with comments
A vast majority of the time, ONE notification will lead to ONE AND
ONLY ONE work order. There are SOME notifications that lead to two (or
more) work orders.
I need to find a way to highlight those that lead to two or more.
The best I could come up with was:
- Sort
- Do a lookup (which would return the FIRST work order associated with
that)
- Have a column, IF LOOKUP = WORK ORDER, 0, 1
- Sort on that 1
But that seems clunky and inaccurate.
Thanks