F
florent prunier
Hello,
Imagine a very simple case study where I work on two fields, let’s say:
<Species> and <Locality>. I want to report the results of an inventory so
that I create a straightforward report.
So far, so good: all my information is correctly sorted. Unfortunately this
solution combining just few hundreds <Species> and few dozens <Localities>
takes thousand of lines! It soon becomes rather tedious to read and not
synthetic at all.
Looking in the archives of this forum, I found the very useful link to a
CONCATENATE function posted by D. Hookom
"There is a generic concatenate function and sample usage at
http://www.rogersaccesslibrary.com/OtherLibraries.asp#Hookom,Duane."
This is really great. This works for a ONE to MANY relation. Unfortunately,
in my case, the relationship is the inverse sense, Mi set up is:
one <Locality> to many <Species> when I want to concatanate Localities
WITHIN species.
Is there another reference? Cheers
Imagine a very simple case study where I work on two fields, let’s say:
<Species> and <Locality>. I want to report the results of an inventory so
that I create a straightforward report.
So far, so good: all my information is correctly sorted. Unfortunately this
solution combining just few hundreds <Species> and few dozens <Localities>
takes thousand of lines! It soon becomes rather tedious to read and not
synthetic at all.
Looking in the archives of this forum, I found the very useful link to a
CONCATENATE function posted by D. Hookom
"There is a generic concatenate function and sample usage at
http://www.rogersaccesslibrary.com/OtherLibraries.asp#Hookom,Duane."
This is really great. This works for a ONE to MANY relation. Unfortunately,
in my case, the relationship is the inverse sense, Mi set up is:
one <Locality> to many <Species> when I want to concatanate Localities
WITHIN species.
Is there another reference? Cheers