Well I didn't think Kani was asking whether the same user could use both
copies at the same time as much as whether the same license could be
installed on the two machines at the same time. I really don't think that
most people would want to do this other than for development purposes
because there *is* a stability risk in maintaining multiple sessions under
the same logon at the same time. With that said, I don't see the text in the
EULA that prohibits it. So when you say,
---
you will not have a problem connecting from both desktop and laptop from a
technical perspective. But you would run afoul of the EULA since the only
way you can have it installed on both machines is with the understanding
that they would not both be used at the same time.
---
Are you basing it on the following EULA statement?
Except in the case of remote assistance, only one user
at a time may use these copies.
My read is that one person, the user of the designated machines, can use
these "copies," stated as plural. It doesn't say that "only one user at a
time may use one of these copies at a time."
Brian, where does this interpretation come from? It sure seems to me that
the EULA language should be more specific if "single user using one or the
other of two copies" is the licensure intent.<g>
