Continual Error 1321 Trying to Install Office 2003

C

Chad Harris

One main question I have is can you custom install office to the point of
keeping one file or folder from installing which is my snag?
Are there any 2003 resource kit tools that will help you do this? Will
using Office 2003 Editions Resource Kit
Ork.exe

or

Office 2003 Setup.exe (Enhanced Version)
EntSetup.exe 2/24/04 Approximate file size: 210 KB
A self-extracting executable (EXE) file that contains Office
2003 Setup version 11.0.6176.0. For more information about the benefits of
this enhanced version, see New Setup.exe Fine Tunes Local Caching.


help me keep from installing wisptis.exe?


I posted this in the setup forum but from what I can tell the Setup group
has *no one responding to setup problems.* It does have miscellaneous
Office problems posted there that could be posted here where people who are
regulars here with help help with non-setup problems over there.

Every time I try setp, with of course AV off and even with an "msconfig
clean boot, I get a 1321 setup error. Is it possible to custom install
and tweak to the file level to leave out wisptis.exe, and is it possible to
install in Safe Mode or do you lose the MSI in Safe Mode or something else
needed to run the Office setup? I have tried naming these 3 files to"
..old":
C:\Config.MSI file
Mapi32.dll
MAPI.dll

*Every time I try setp, with of course AV off and even with an msconfig
clean boot, I get the setup error with a diffent numbered C:\Config.MSI
file number. Is it possible to custom install and tweak to the file level
to leave out wisptis.exe, and is it possible to install in Safe Mode or do
you lose the MSI in Safe Mode or something else needed to run the Office
setup?*

MOS 2003 Pro install setup error on Win XP Pro SP1. I was having trouble
getting the BCM add-in to associate with OL 2003. I was asked to uninstall
BCM and MOS 2003 Pro and then to reinstall MOS 2003. MOS 2003 was working
fine. With support help from MSFT Office specialist (not Convergys) we
meticulously deleted the appropriate reg keys and files. We were going to
use the Windows Installer Cleanup Utility, but it didn't list MOS 2003 so we
did it manually.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;290301
I am getting the following setup errors and setup stops when trying to
install wisptis.exe. Wisptis.exe is unfortunately installed with MOS and it
works with tablet PC. If you don't have a tablet, it stubbornly starts and
helps itself to CPU. Just ending it as a process or trying to use msconfig
won't stop it. A CPU gobbler that far and away most of the population
dosn't need as a gift from the MOS developers and product team with every
Office installation is ridiculous, but someone at Redmond made that call.
These two links context how to get rid of it and I used one of these tools.
They work and wisptis.exe disappears from your procdesses. Now I think this
is causing me problems on the reinstall.

I took steps here to uninstall wisptis.exe and use the wisptis tool:

http://www.longhorn.be/modules.php?name=Downloads&d_op=MostPopular

http://www.boredguru.com/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=193&forum=24



I'm getting this Error: Error 1321: Setup cannot modify the file
C:\Config.MSI 3a5322.rbf. Verify that the file exists (it doesn't) in your
system and that you have sufficient permission to update it. Should I
search for this to download it? Could it possibly have been eliminated iin
getting rid of the wisptis.exe annoyance?

File Extension Details for RBF: Roll Back File Backup of existing file
stored in hidden CONFIG.MSI directory.

http://filext.com/detaillist.php?extdetail=RBF (3rd entry down)

KB that superficially references setup problem by referring to one registry
value:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;232143

This KB deals with the error in Office XP and recommends checking a registry
value here. My value is correct and conforms with this solution:

HKEY_Local_Machine/Software/Microsoft/Windows NT/CurrentVersion/Winlogon
1.. In the right pane, right-click AllocateCDRoms, and then click Modify.
2.. In the Value data box, type 0 (zero), and then click OK.

3.. Would appreciate if anyone has suggestions as to how to overcome this
setup error.

TIA,

Chad Harris
 
C

Chad Harris

Hi Mary--Thanks for taking a swing at this. I'm really greatful for any
help. Knocking out annoying Wisptis probably took config.msi files that
it needs and now setup wants to stuff it back in. Wisptis is explained
below. It's installed by MOS 2003, the Journal viewer, and Adobe Acrobat
Reader 6.0 from what I can see from googling it. I have Adobe 6 also.
Wisptis was uninstalled. I should have tried tip to get rid of it, and I
should have thought of it it's so basic, but I didn't see it when I went
after it--but this method just below might have still given me the install
problem if it disabled or got rid of those config.msi files.

An easier way to do it is to right click on the file
C:\windows\system32\wisptis.exe, click Properties, go to the security tab
and remove all permissions except An easier way to do it is to right click
on the file C:\windows\system32\wisptis.exe, click Properties, go to the
security tab and remove all permissions except for Read permissions.You'll
never see it run again.

*Where do you mean to go to "options" and disable Office plug-ins?* What do
you think of trying to get back files that setup wants for its never needed
turkey wisptis (unless you are using a paritcular tablet component) using
System File Checker? At least running SFC rarely causes any problems.
Also do you think there is any way to download any tool for the resource kit
that will let me do a detailed enough or selective enough custom install to
single out wisptis and keep it from installing? My reasoning there is if I
can keep wisptis from knocking on the door with the setup, the setup will
move on to completion.

*I'm going to try what you suggested as soon as I can clear up the answer to
where you mean by Options to disable plug-ins.*

I also wondered if by running System File Checker, I could get back any
config.MSI files would help, but setup is balking everytime on getting
wisptis in by saying it doesn't have access to certain different numbered
config.msi files.

******** This all started out with my wanting to associate BCM with Outlook
and now I can't get Office in. I'm ready to try setup with script
blocking disabled, but I'm not following where "in options" I can disable
Office Plug-ins. Options on the Norton interface? IE Internet Options? I
couldn't find any Office Plug-Ins. ********

I can't do any kind of repair from Maintainance Mode of course, because
Office is not installed. I saw the KB--it's no help. Like a lot of KBs
it has a helpful sounding title with very little of substance inside. The
problem with a 1321 setup error is all kinds of things can cause it. I need
to explain to you what wisptis.exe is and how it came about.

Every time I try to run set up, it almost gets through and the the bar stops
with good old wisptis.exe on the box. I put the wispis info below so you
could browse it. I didn't want to distract from telling you at the top what
I think happened. I got a removal tool from one of the sites below for
wiptis. I can see it as an .rar file in my downloads file. Also after
rereading the desciption I don't know if some reg key could have been
modified by wisptis to make reinstall of Office hard. Now when I try the
setup, it runs to close to completion, then the progress bar stops with the
label "installing wisptis.exe" * I think when I ran the removal tool
(successfully) to get rid of wisptis it also took out some some of the
config.msi files that good ole wiptis wants to install. 99.999999% of
people running Office don't use a tablet. The development teams and product
managers for Office could have put it on a MSFT downloads site with links
from the MSFT Office site. I'd love to see whoever got the great idea to
explain what they were thinking when they wove it into Office 2003. Now I
understand why I hear over and over and over that Redmond developers are
completely on a planet of their own, and often not even making great contact
with the Product managers and their teams.

I was asked by a MSFT Office specialist to meticulously uninstall Office
which was working just fine. One thing that spooked people and I can't
explain is that for a transient period of time, I was getting an Outlook
2000 splash screen on opening Office 2003 but after that I was getting the
normal Outlook splash screen. OL was working just fine; I just couldn't get
BCM associated with it after trying every thing I could think of. I had
Office XP, and then when I got MOS 2003 I let setup uninstall it. I mean
of course uninstalling and reinstalling MOS 2003 would be no big deal--but I
had gotten a lot of extras from the MSFT site and others that were nifty and
I hated going after them again. Here's some context for wisptis? Do you
have it showing up in processes on any of your MOS 2003 machines?


*What Wisptis is--among other things, certainly not needed in Micorosft
Office--it should have been an optional download.* I have long ago given up
on trying to figure out the answer to "What were they thinkiing?" when it
comes to developers or Product Teams on the Redmond campus. "Let's put in a
pen data collection component for Tablet PC whether anyone has a tablet or
not. It'll serve as a great memory hog with excellent potential to freeze
computers and send CPU to 100%!!! But let's not tell anyone this can
happen. Let them be surprised."

http://216.239.57.104/search?q=cach...uk/index.php?showtopic=2517+wisptis.exe&hl=en


Wisptis.exe (\Windows\System32) This executable runs as a system
service that provides pen-data collection for other components of the
SDK. When a component needs to interact with the pen (for example, to
collect ink or to detect gestures), this executable is spawned as a
service to communicate directly with the input device. On a Tablet PC,
Wisptis.exe interacts with the digitizer, whereas on a desktop it
interacts with the mouse as well. The executable’s name is an acronym
that references an outdated internal name for the team that developed it
(Windows Ink Services Platform Tablet Input Subsystem).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Well I don't have a Tablet PC and I certainly don't want an unnecessary
process eating up my memory resources.

You cannot get rid of wisptis.exe by renaming or deleting it: Windows File
Protection would cause it to reinstall the next time you run Adobe Acrobat.

There is even a rumor about a bug in wisptis.exe itself whereby it keeps
part of the current user registry hive locked, preventing updates and
eventually resulting in a corruption of the registry hive (which as reported
leads to a "Userenv event 1517" on logging off or shutting down).

Others reported GDI leaks and CPU hogging. I haven't noticed the latter but
can confirm that at one point, the number of open GDI handles by wisptis.exe
was above 1000, which is unacceptable.

So by and large it seems wisptis.exe can make a thorough nuisance of itself.

To uninstall wisptis and Microsoft's Tablet PC Components on your PC, you
must delete the following registry entries:

HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\AppID\{7F429620-16D1-471E-A81A-114992148034}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\AppID\wisptis.EXE
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{04A1E553-FE36-4FDE-865E-344194E69424}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{13DE4A42-8D21-4C8E-BF9C-8F69CB068FCA}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{242025BB-8546-48B6-B9B0-F4406C54ACFC}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{3336B8BF-45AF-429F-85CB-8C435FBF21E4}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{3EE60F5C-9BAD-4CD8-8E21-AD2D001D06EB}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{43B07326-AAE0-4B62-A83D-5FD768B7353C}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{43FB1553-AD74-4EE8-88E4-3E6DAAC915DB}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{524B13ED-2E57-40B8-B801-5FA35122EB5C}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{632A2D3D-86AF-411A-8654-7511B51B3D5F}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{65D00646-CDE3-4A88-9163-6769F0F1A97D}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{6E4FCB12-510A-4D40-9304-1DA10AE9147C}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{786CDB70-1628-44A0-853C-5D340A499137}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{836FA1B6-1190-4005-B434-7ED921BE2026}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{8770D941-A63A-4671-A375-2855A18EBA73}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{8854F6A0-4683-4AE7-9191-752FE64612C3}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{937C1A34-151D-4610-9CA6-A8CC9BDB5D83}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{9C1CC6E4-D7EB-4EEB-9091-15A7C8791ED9}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{9DE85094-F71F-44F1-8471-15A2FA76FCF3}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{9FD4E808-F6E6-4E65-98D3-AA39054C1255}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{A5558507-9B96-46BA-94ED-982E684A9A6B}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{A5B020FD-E04B-4E67-B65A-E7DEED25B2CF}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{AAC46A37-9229-4FC0-8CCE-4497569BF4D1}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{C52FF1FD-EB6C-42CF-9140-83DEFECA7E29}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{D8BF32A2-05A5-44C3-B3AA-5E80AC7D2576}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{DE815B00-9460-4F6E-9471-892ED2275EA5}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{E3D5D93C-1663-4A78-A1A7-22375DFEBAEE}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{E5CA59F5-57C4-4DD8-9BD6-1DEEEDD27AF4}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{E9A6AB1B-0C9C-44AC-966E-560C2771D1E8}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{EFB4A0CB-A01F-451C-B6B7-56F02F77D76F}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{F0291081-E87C-4E07-97DA-A0A03761E586}

HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Installer\Components\BCA32ECD550 E1F4488DBD2A1578ACF8B
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Installer\Features\7040110900063
D11C8EF10054038389C\WISPFiles
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Installer\Features\7040110900063
D11C8EF10054038389C\WISPHidden

HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\TpcCom.* (all of them)

HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\TypeLib\{194508A0-B8D1-473E-A9B6-851AAF726A6D}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\TypeLib\{56D04F5D-964F-4DBF-8D23-B97989E53418}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\TypeLib\{773F1B9A-35B9-4E95-83A0-A210F2DE3B37}
HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\TypeLib\{7D868ACD-1A5D-4A47-A247-F39741353012}

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\Curr
entVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Components\1125549C421D34E4DBF1036F62
580BE1
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\Curr
entVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Components\652A08B235C6DFF4C8CD41B52D
E68CA4
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\Curr
entVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Components\9B4B5940D4625D64C85532B8CD
E3BF4D
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\Curr
entVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Components\D656DA4A9E277A34D90D5E6FFA
34E827
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\Curr
entVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\7040110900063D11C8EF10054038
389C\Featu res\WISPFiles
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\Curr
entVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\7040110900063D11C8EF10054038
389C\Featu res\WISPHidden

Now you can also safely delete \Windows\System32\Wisptis.exe. Make sure the
process is not running; otherwise kill it before deletion.

Fully tested on an up-to-date Windows XP SP1.
Wisptis is a Tablet PC platform component that someone on the Office
development team decided to load as far as I can tell with Office 2003, even
though 99.9% of Office users don't have a Tablet interacting with their PC.
It could have been made available on the Office site, the Windows Mobile
site, and the MS Tablet site, but no--they made it a mandatory install as
far as I can tell. Most people tell me it's listed in processes when they
install Office 2003, but some have said they don't see it. It takes up CPU,
and when it's not in the system 32 folder it can be a virus or Trojan like
so many normal processes exploited by them, and it's very difficult if not
impossible to keep it from starting up. So I ran a toolfrom one of these
sites to uninstall it and I think deleted a few reg keys associated with it.
Now I think I'm paying the price.

I got the removal tool which did the job or the removal tool and the
sequence of steps from one of these sites:

http://www.boredguru.com/modules/do...redguru.com/modules/downloads/visit.php?lid=4

http://216.239.51.104/search?q=cach....php?topic_id=193&forum=24+wisptis.exe+&hl=en

http://www.aswinnen.be/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=53

http://216.239.51.104/search?q=cach...en.be/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid%

Couillon Inc. has fixed the issues with the WISPTIS.EXE process. You'll see
your non-tablet PC freaking when this process is running, and you'll have
this process running if you have Microsoft Journal Viewer or Adobe
Acrobat/Reader 6.0 or MS Office System 2003 installed

Of course this fix is available through our Downloads section.

Enjoy It!

UPDATE: We've re-released the fix with some minor improvements...

You can download it over here
3D53+wisptis.exe&hl=en

Thanks,

Chad Harris

____________________________________________________________________
 
M

Mary Sauer

Hi Chad,
Have you tried cleaning up the Installer?
Description of the Windows Installer CleanUp Utility
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;290301&Product=off2003

There is a knowledge base article that may relate.
Office 2003 Install May Fail When You Use a Transform File
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;818239&Product=off2003

When you open Norton, near the top is the options button, this is where you disable
office plug-ins. In my opinion Norton should be disabled altogether before you
install.

Installshield has some documents too
ERRDOC: Windows Installer Error 1321
http://support.installshield.com/kb/view.asp?articleid=Q107388

I have wisptis on my computer, it was installed when I installed Office. I also have
Adobe 6, but doing a search on my computer does not have show evidences of it being
part of Adobe.

Have you setup a log?
How to use an Office 2003 Setup log file to troubleshoot Setup problems
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=826511

Yours is a rare error... if you ever get it worked out let me know. I wish I could be
more help. Hopefully someone will jump in here and solve it for you.
 
C

Chad Harris

Mary--

I want to thank you again. I got a chance to look at your site, and I truly
appreciate the high quality of help that MS MVPs and others unselfishly
offer on the Office/Outlook groups day after day that allows you to get a
lot of valuable links and between the lines help/ learning to supplement
books.

As to evidence of which app installed wisptis, I suppose you'd have to set
view to show the criteria for origin, date, or notice when you're doing it,
or associate a download date from your downloads file if you save the
download setups, zips, .exes, ect in a downloads folder. I just know Office
2003 sure wants to install it and stalls when it can't because the progress
bar freezes with wisptis front and center and then I get all the
config.msi.rbf error messages.

Is there any way in the world to get into setup with some custom tool from
the Resource kit or somewhere else and surgically/selectively remove wisptis
which is the prime cause for my 1321 setup snag?

I want to ask this *first* because it hasn't been answered yet. Is there
any way to be able to surgically single out Wisptis and keep it off the list
of things setup is trying to get in? I tried last night to open up a
custom install with a tool for the resource kit because I couldn't do it
from the default setup with a custom install Probably not, but if that were
possible, if I could get into the guts of setup with some tool and nuke
wisptis, then I'd be able to get Office back in. I even wonder what tricks I
could play with this setup if I knew more dos--if I could get at the wisptis
file through the command prompt and keep it the ___ out of setup that way.

I don't know how you tell which of the 3 apps--the MSFT Journal Viewer,
Adobe Reader 6, or Office 03 installs wisptis--except by date of the install
if you configure the view to show that or can find it in your downloads
folder since almost everybody has Adobe Reader although maybe not 6, I do
have the Journal Viewer entry on the WICleanUP, but I don't know what
uninstalling it would do to help this problem now.

I want to be clear about a couple things so you know what I've tried; that
I'm glad to try anything you suggest, and that I appreciate your time and
effort. I search KBs pretty regularly, and the KB 231243 for the 1321
error (that was I found within seconds of setup balking) offered one thing
and that was to check a registry key value--my original post was long so you
might not have seen it but I had that value as zero so it didn't offer me
any setting that I didn't already have.

As far as Office plug-ins and Norton AV or System Works, I don't see any
Office plugs ins or even the same configuration with my version of Norton as
the help describes, but that's no surprise that has happened before.
Norton Help references looking in the "left pain under other" of the options
window for Office plug ins. There is no "other," and there is no "left
pain." and I've drilled options and don't see any mention of Office plug ins
on anything you can click. I don't see anything under web tools listed at
all. I'll be glad to uninstall Norton if I can get it to uninstall
cleanly--often a tricky proposition once you've had an SP2 build on your
machine because Seattle and Capertuino California are apparently not
speaking to one another and SP2 users are going to really enjoy the result
of that. No mention of that fact in the 300 million dollar ad campasomeone
is hatching for SP2 next month.

I checked for quotes in the setup.ini file MST section and found no quotes
and very little there per the KB 818239. I'm chewing on Install Shield doc
Q107388 now. I don't understand their reference to patching strategy unless
they mean some MSI patch. All Office 2003's are gone with it. The document
on patching strategy makes me wonder if any update or patch for install
shield from their library would help me. I also wondered if I could
redownload the MSI and refresh files and it would do any good.

I thought of trying Safe Mode but the MSI installer may not get loaded in
Safe Mode. I saw
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;823816&Product=off2003
and wondered if the "setup.ini wizard" mentioned could help me if there were
one and there doesn't seem to be or at least they want to say if you use it
for 2003 since it's for Office XP and there are problems, don't look to us.

When I was working with the gentleman from *MSFT, he wanted to use the
Windows Installer Cleanup Utility but we couldn't *simply because* there was
no listing for MOS 2003 in it, so we couldn't select what wasn't there.
One thing I'd like to ask, is it not uncommon when someone has uninstalled
something let's say Office Systems 2003 or another version, that if there
are components to "clean up" that you'd still see an entry for Office 2003
after you uninstalled it? Because if that's not the case then once you
uninstalled you can't use that utility. If you uninstalled Office and you
don't see it, does that imply there aren't remnants for it to clean?

So the MSFT office specialist had a list of registry keys including GUIDs
and also all the Office folders he wanted to nuke, and nuke we did so
hopefully we could get it meticulously off. Office was working fine, I
just couldn't install BCM so the MSFT Office specialist wanted a clean
slate so he insisted that I uninstall Office. And any of us understand
that--files could be corrupt; registry strings or orphans could be a problem
and I agreed with that logic and uninstalled it. I didn't count on the so
not needed WISPTIS for tablet PCs would come back to bite me. Again I love
MSFT Office developer logic--less than .05% of people using Office even have
a tablet PC since it has so much evolving to do compared to a loaded quality
notebook with the newest features as far as a dollar choice, and it gobbles
CPU sometimes considerable CPU, so let's make it mandatory to install it.
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________


*My Lack of MSFT Support Rant and View Hex Error Messages Do Nothing for the
User to Solve a Problem in Real Time so why offer them to the User?*


I was also running SP2 at the time as a Beta tester, and even though I had
tried to associate BCM before with SP2 uninstalled and going back to SP1,
they wanted to work with SP2 off. I don't believe that SP2 is the problem
with associating that desktop SQL MSDE with Outlook. I think it has more to
do with the fact that it's the first .net add in MSFT has had and they
pushed it out unfinished with a lot of problems as a fairly buggy Beta but
they called it RTM. No big precedent there--it happens with all their
software to degrees and certainly happens with the Windows OS and Office and
will be the case with Longhorn and Blackcomb. So here is this company who
is going to spend $300 million dollars to promote XP SP2 because they want
way more than 250 million legitimate copies sold--if SP2 is radically
different someone wake me up because I've read everything MSFT has written
on it. It baby sits and reminds people to use a firewall and update viral
definitions some of whom are much more concerned about the latest Kazaa lite
fileshare. That's why some of the best and brightest universities in the US
become viral infected every single day.

My point here is that this company that I like is going to spend this huge
amount of money promoting SP2--but they are telling me that they don't think
an Office component out of a $500 box of Office is compatible with what they
are feverishely trying to get on every OEM computer and the OEM companies
are perenially like somoene who is thirsty in the desert--they want moisture
and they aren't particularlly worried about whether the water is safe or
not. Anything that even hints of a new OS wrinkle the OEMs always push for.
You don't have to be a NYT, WSJ, IBD afficianado to get that. I think one
add campaign I won't see from whoever handles the promotion is "Watchout!!!!
Don't buy Office because SP2 won't work with one of the CD's in Office Pro
or Office Enterprise edition. We are recalling Office because of SP2.
SP2 isn't the problem with BCM, but it's a good excuse for Convergys to say
we don't support a Beta when they don't know anything about the Office
add-in BCM and they don't.

But once SP2 releases to manufacture with the major problem that it's not
compatible with Norton Internet Security or Norton System Works, and RC1 is
public now being promoted on TechNet's site as a download, so I am
perfectly OK in saying that using Norton will evoke screens that say it's
not compatible with SP2 builds (all of them). It must be further than I
thought from Redmond Washington to Cupertino California and I suppose MSFT
is not allowed to use Live Meeting or even Net Meeting that's still in XP by
putting "conf" in the run box, or a cell phone, or email out of Redmond to
communicate with Symantec Enterprise/Norton Home and Small Business users to
iron out the kinks. It won't be the first time. And I know for a fact
they've heard from plenty of people using SP2 on this.

At this time I want to point out how much help the all hex all the time
error messages are for the consumer or even the Sys Ad maven. Few people
have the tools and training to interpret these hex errors, so they are zero
help to most of us. The site .oca.microsoft.com the so-called crash
analysis site is completely and utterly worthless--I've played with it for
three years and never seen it yield anything but that there's no solution
for any given error at this time. What they're thinking with it I don't
know. I have heard people from Redmond speak of real time practical error
help about the time Longhorn every births, but Longhorn ain't no short term
solution and it's a different vision depending on what side of the bead Mr.
Allchin wakes up on. Right now helpful error messages are in the primitive
stages. Many of the KBs have little or no help and I've read a few
thousand, and many are superficial brushes by the subject like the single
one on the 1321 error with its reference to one registry key.

_____________________________________________________


*I mean MSFT because I want to be clear that Convergys can't and doesn't
support BCM. Its employees doesn't know anything about BCM and by and
large the phone support for MSFT is from Convergys employees, many of whom
want to keep it an NSA secret that they work for Convergys. I'd be hiding
as well if I were Convergys. They have a compelling reason to hide and MSFT
has a compelling reason to hide that they farm support out to them.

So I persisted in asking for help from MSFT. Call me silly. I believed
the Redmond company that makes and develops and writes code for the product
and sells it at quite a profit and lives quite well because of these sales
should actually support the product. Likewise the Convergys support route
knows next to nothing about Office setup problems as well but they call
themselves "set up specialists" much like a degree mill where you can buy a
Ph.D. in whatever field over the web in seconds and call yourself Dr. Bozo.

Chad Harris

____________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________
 
C

Chad Harris

Mary--

I finally got it in and without the @@@###$$%%%%% Redmond wisptis.exe and
your links pushed me to keep trying.

1) I blew off Norton.
2) I used a Beta RC1 MSI 3.0 installer.
3) I got a 1911 error that gave me the chance to say no to wisptis and I got
my Office back.

Here's what I take away from this. I installed MOS 2003 two or three times
and paid no attention to Norton but from now on I'll always shut it down
during Office and major installations or installations that are having
problems getting in that I can detect. The MSI or Windows Installer has
always had problems, and if you're encountering stubborn set up errors like
this one, anything you can do to repair or get a new installer may get the
job done.

BTW--Whisptis.exe is not the only illconceived .exe to completely escape
Beta testing. And I can appreciate that wisptis although not needed by 99+%
of Office users may not be causing problems, but when it is keeping you from
installing Office because you got rid of it that takes on a whole new
dimension. Note this by Sam Gentile (experienced engineer, .net developer
and author on .net since it's inception on his blog:

Outlook 2003 Causing CRSS.EXE to go spastic!

http://samgentile.com/blog/archive/2004/01/15/11186.aspx

I have been spending so much time trying to get Office in the last few days,
that I was pretty burned out but when you stuck with it I decided to give it
one more try. I know set up problems aren't that interesting to people
unless it's their own and installers aren't by a long shot the most
satisfying part of Office or Windows obviously, but when you need them they
become important. It's not near as much fun as clip art can be, but without
Office you aren't using Office clip art. So thanks for sticking with it and
stretching to get some good resources that I still want to learn about.
Obviously Install Shield had a way to log installs (and that made me think
of Verbose logging as well) and in the right hands that could produce the
info you need I imagine.

Here's what it did and I have my MSO 2003 back working well. Whether MSFT
knows how to get in their BCM remains to be seen. I think they have the
developers for that add-in hidden better than WMD in/out of Iraq. I still
am going to pursue the answers to my questions but one in a sense did get
answered.

1) I decided since every single experienced Office user, MVPs and MSFT
Office people are unanimous in saying that Norton can definitely interfere
with Office installations in particular to nuke Norton off my computer.
2) I decided maybe I needed some new blood in my installer. Because, and I
don't know and want to find out how experienced Office set up people would
describe this but my errors may have indicated components of the MSI itself
were missing, or that .dlls that the installer writes to or calls on or
invokes including the many C:\config.msi.rbf numbered files invoked in the
errors were missing. I had mentioned to you and I've seen the concept
batted in XP newsgroups, that maybe I could download the MSI
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/...FamilyID=CEBBACD8-C094-4255-B702-DE3BB768148F

but if I remember correctly, you can update for 95, 98, ME or what people
call the MSFT Wintendo OS's, but XP contains the correct installer--2.0
and XP SP2 contains the Betas I believe of 3.0 and I suppose they will
dovetail MSI 3.0 for the XP SP2 RTM.

This is the quote on the link above. I was thinking that you might be able
to find the download for Windows Installer 2.0 and refresh the files.
That's also what I attempted to do when I ran System File Checker last night
and it didn't help. I was trying desparately to fix the installer or give
the installer any of the C:\Config.msi files it needed that were damaged or
missing by running SFC.

"Windows XP contains Windows Installer 2.0 and therefore can't be installed
or upgraded by this redistributable."

*So that raises the question how does one fix MSI 2.0 in Windows XP if they
need to to install whatever Office included?* So I decided to use and I'm
not discussing it I'm just saying I used it the Beta MSI 3.0 crossing my
fingers it would help me. I knew it might complicate things but I could
always blow it off. I plan to put that question on the XP Customize group
because I may be able to draw an answer there or if there is an XP setup
group or an MSDN group where I can get it answered so much the better.


3) Then I ran MOS 2003 set up. I got this error and this is one of my
favorite error experiences. I betcha the GUID referenced is the GUID for
the Tablet PC ink component, the little CPU gobbler that MSFT Office
developers have so generously shoved down the throat of anyone who installs
MSFT Office whether they plan to touch a tablet PC or not. And it's not
that I don't think tablets will be a definite part of many verticals,
schools, and companies and have lots of potential, its just that MSFT has no
business sticking a little used file that can cause serious CPU freezes for
such a little utilized purpose when they could make it optional. And after
all, since both wisptis.exe can "freak" your CPU as well as

In connection with the 1911 error below I got what is my favorite dialogue
box of the year. Doyawanna retry or doyawanna ignore? And it was there
that I found my holy grail that I'd been looking for--how to install MOS
2003 and surgically blow off the infamous trouble maker wisptis.exe. I hit
IGNORE and the installation zoomed right on without it and installed
successfully.

Product: Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003 -- Error 1911. Setup
cannot register type library for file C:\WINDOWS\System32\WISPTIS.EXE.
Contact Microsoft Product Support Services (PSS) for assistance. For
information about how to contact PSS, see
G:\FILES\PFILES\MSOFFICE\OFFICE11\1033\PSS10R.CHM.

Detection of product '{91E30409-6000-11D3-8CFE-0150048383C9}', feature
'HandWritingFiles' failed during request for component
'{E6BFD503-3A35-4B78-BAB5-9570EDDEF81C}'

Product: Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003 -- Installation
operation completed successfully. Product: Microsoft Office Professional
Edition 2003 -- Configuration completed successfully.

So thanks very much for the help Mary. I hate the time these MSFT Windows
and Office problems can take, but putting things together and solving them
is a sweet feeling--and you hope you're a little bit better able to handle
the next similar one because it's just around the corner.

Chad Harris



____________________________________________________________________________
______________________
 
M

Mary Sauer

Chad, I am saving your posts. As you wrote, around the corner there will be another
person having your issue. I am not as articulate as yourself; you do have a way with
words. I have learned much from your experience and I truly appreciate your sharing
the process with the newsgroup.
Enjoy Office, it is a superior product in everyway. It would be great if all
computers were created equal and everyone could whiz through the processes without
issue.
I wish everyone was as tenacious as you have been.
Mary
 
C

Chad Harris

Mary--

I felt badly that my wording may have sounded I meant I hoped" you Mary"
are better able to handle the next one--that wasn't what I mean't--I meant
when one of these thorny little numbers comes "my" way that I hope "I'm"
better able to handle the next one, having learned a little from this one--I
was very appreciative that your links were really thoughtful ones, and
enough off the beaten path that I would not have thought of going to an
Install Shield KB and wouldn't have found the other one. I've been working
hard to solve this because as you know when one of these type things
happens--that is I can't install Office no matter what I do--it takes on an
obsessional proportion because it's more than a minor annoyance particularly
when you need Word and Outlook badly. You're easily as articulate as I am,
and I am plenty envious of what the MVPs and a number of other regular
posters on the Office group like Bob Buckland know and just read different
people's posts like they were part of a between the lines book.

*Fortunately, the way I did get rid of wisptis.exe now puts me in the
position of a welcome 1911 setup error that allows me to tell setup to
ignore wisptis that every single Office app tries to install. Last night I
put in the One Note SP1 preview, and it tried to get wisptis in but the 1911
error allowed me to do exactly what I had been trying to find a way to
do--surgically remove wisptis from an Office app install by telling the
error dialogue box to ignore wisptis. *

I know now that right clicking that wisptis.exe folder in the to right
click on the file C:\windows\system32\wisptis.exe, click Properties, go to
the security tab and remove all permissions except for Read permissions
would have probably been the more intelligent and safe way for me to get it
out of the way and not damage MSI files and jeapordize an Office reinstall
or even naming the file to .old would have worked, but I'm not sure what
that may have done to something else.

Interestingly with respect to wisptis for the tablet pen, there have been
discussions that MSFT *may* stop making Tablet PC software. I ran accross
this mention from Ed Bott's http://www.edbott.com/bookstore.htm site where
Ed discusses Lonestar http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000145.html
updates for Tablet in Win XP SP2 and I hope they won't have the problematic
CPU drain that wisptis.exe can pose.



One of the confusing things to me is that I know that the install uninstall
process for many applications can be far from meticulous. I don't have a
clear understanding of when the Windows Installer or the MSI partners with
other installers from the developer of the app itself. I don't have a clear
idea of whether Install Shield makes a frequent partner of the MSFT
installer (the MSI or the Windows installer) but from their site I can tell
they make a lot of different installers and some that cost and must be used
by developers or software engineers.

This raised a lot of questions for me--

1) What did I accomplish that overcame the Beta by downloading the almost
RTM'd MSI 3.0? I kept racking my brain as to how I could "get a new
installer" and came to the conclusion that Win 9X users could go to MSFT
downloads and update their MSI 1.0's that probably came with 95, 98, and the
dreaded ME. But the download site says that XP already natively has 2.0 so
I wondered if I could have used that 2.0 upgrade for Win 9X to replace my
files and make a new installer but I worried that I would be rolling the
dice if I tried. Getting installer information that can be translated into
day to day language for me is not very easy. I've tried. I also think that
sometimes an app can be very well designed but because of time, resources
and training the installer that the developer for the app makes to partner
with the Microsoft installer may have problems and that may particularly
lead to uninstall clutter like distorted registry keys or orphaned registry
keys that can create problems in the immediate or more distant future.

2) The Office expert I worked with wanted to try to use the Windows clean up
utility before we nuked registry keys --many CLIDs among them and every
single Office file by hand but MSO 2003 was not listed in it's scroll down
list so we couldn't use it. That raises the question why a major MSFT
application like Office wouldn't be listed there.

3) I need to get some help understanding these tools from the resource kit
better, and sadly even if I sat down with the $60 to $70 book I don't know
if I'd come away with a clear idea.

I still wonder if there is a tool from the Resource Kit
http://www.microsoft.com/office/ork/2003/tools/default.htm
like the Custom Install kit that I could have deployed to repair my MSI and
replace the missing files. I wondered about tools from the site-- the
Custom Installation Wizard,
http://www.microsoft.com/office/ork/2003/tools/BoxA03.htm
the Enhaced Office setup.exe
http://www.microsoft.com/office/ork/2003/tools/BoxA23.htm

or I wondered if the Custom Maintaince Wizard,
http://www.microsoft.com/office/ork/2003/tools/BoxA04.htm
I wondered if I could get help from the MST File Viewer
http://www.microsoft.com/office/ork/2003/tools/BoxA05.htm

I don' t really know how to use these tools even after I read the
descriptions here
http://www.microsoft.com/office/ork/2003/tools/default.htm.

4) When I took the cue of one of your links, I didn't have any quotes around
any MSI files in notepad, let alone hardly any files, and I wondered why?

Thanks so much again, because if it hadn't been for your thoughtful links I
might not have persisted in the marathon obsession to get my Office back and
come up with the idea of an out of the box way of how to get a new
competent version of MSI that could get around the problem. I may not have
been able to find a way to repair MSI 2.0 although maybe there is a site out
there--I'll have to look, but geting 3.0 worked out well. There's an
example where using a Beta fixed a major problem.

Thanks very much again, Mary. I really like Office. I just need to work to
learn much more about the components so I can realize some of its potential.

Chad Harris
 
B

Bob Buckland ?:-\)

Hi Chad,

The WIPTIS.exe file is indeed part of Office 2003, but it can
depend on which install choices you had and if you were doing
a fresh install or an upgrade for example on whether Office would
have been the one that put it in play. You also mentioned OneNote
and that would be a good proability as well. Since WIPTIS would
be seen as a 'shared' resource Office may also have looked at
installing/updating it if you had installed it from another source.

Did you by any chance retain any of the setup log files
(type %TEMP% in Start=>Run to go to the usual location <g>)
from the Error 1321 runs? If so, would you zip and email them
along with a recap of the steps you took. It does sound as if
doing a disable/removal manually may have triggered MSI's self healing,
which can get confused at times :)

Generally, trying to install a MS Installer upgrade would have done
a Windows version check and an MSI version check. You did mention
that you were using a pre-release (RC1) to MSI 3 at one point in
the process?

You wouldn't ordinarily need to create a different MSI, but, depending
on Office version and license may be able to use the MS Office Resource
Kit tools to create an MST (Transform).
Basically the Custom Installation Wizard is an automation of a
hand install of Office 2003 using custom install choices and the
Custom Maintenance Wizard is an automation of going through Add/Remove
Programs and Changing MS Office 2003 feature settings.

Do you recall if you were able to successfully run a Repair/Reinstall
of Office 2003 from Add/Remove Programs in the Windows Control Panel
before you tried to use the MS Installer Cleanup Utility (and do you
have the latest version of the Cleanup Utility)?

=======
Mary--

I felt badly that my wording may have sounded I meant I hoped" you Mary"
are better able to handle the next one--that wasn't what I mean't--I meant
when one of these thorny little numbers comes "my" way that I hope "I'm"
better able to handle the next one, having learned a little from this one--I
was very appreciative that your links were really thoughtful ones, and
enough off the beaten path that I would not have thought of going to an
Install Shield KB and wouldn't have found the other one. I've been working
hard to solve this because as you know when one of these type things
happens--that is I can't install Office no matter what I do--it takes on an
obsessional proportion because it's more than a minor annoyance particularly
when you need Word and Outlook badly. You're easily as articulate as I am,
and I am plenty envious of what the MVPs and a number of other regular
posters on the Office group like Bob Buckland know and just read different
people's posts like they were part of a between the lines book.

*Fortunately, the way I did get rid of wisptis.exe now puts me in the
position of a welcome 1911 setup error that allows me to tell setup to
ignore wisptis that every single Office app tries to install. Last night I
put in the One Note SP1 preview, and it tried to get wisptis in but the 1911
error allowed me to do exactly what I had been trying to find a way to
do--surgically remove wisptis from an Office app install by telling the
error dialogue box to ignore wisptis. *

I know now that right clicking that wisptis.exe folder in the to right
click on the file C:\windows\system32\wisptis.exe, click Properties, go to
the security tab and remove all permissions except for Read permissions
would have probably been the more intelligent and safe way for me to get it
out of the way and not damage MSI files and jeapordize an Office reinstall
or even naming the file to .old would have worked, but I'm not sure what
that may have done to something else.

Interestingly with respect to wisptis for the tablet pen, there have been
discussions that MSFT *may* stop making Tablet PC software. I ran accross
this mention from Ed Bott's http://www.edbott.com/bookstore.htm site where
Ed discusses Lonestar http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000145.html
updates for Tablet in Win XP SP2 and I hope they won't have the problematic
CPU drain that wisptis.exe can pose.



One of the confusing things to me is that I know that the install uninstall
process for many applications can be far from meticulous. I don't have a
clear understanding of when the Windows Installer or the MSI partners with
other installers from the developer of the app itself. I don't have a clear
idea of whether Install Shield makes a frequent partner of the MSFT
installer (the MSI or the Windows installer) but from their site I can tell
they make a lot of different installers and some that cost and must be used
by developers or software engineers.

This raised a lot of questions for me--

1) What did I accomplish that overcame the Beta by downloading the almost
RTM'd MSI 3.0? I kept racking my brain as to how I could "get a new
installer" and came to the conclusion that Win 9X users could go to MSFT
downloads and update their MSI 1.0's that probably came with 95, 98, and the
dreaded ME. But the download site says that XP already natively has 2.0 so
I wondered if I could have used that 2.0 upgrade for Win 9X to replace my
files and make a new installer but I worried that I would be rolling the
dice if I tried. Getting installer information that can be translated into
day to day language for me is not very easy. I've tried. I also think that
sometimes an app can be very well designed but because of time, resources
and training the installer that the developer for the app makes to partner
with the Microsoft installer may have problems and that may particularly
lead to uninstall clutter like distorted registry keys or orphaned registry
keys that can create problems in the immediate or more distant future.

2) The Office expert I worked with wanted to try to use the Windows clean up
utility before we nuked registry keys --many CLIDs among them and every
single Office file by hand but MSO 2003 was not listed in it's scroll down
list so we couldn't use it. That raises the question why a major MSFT
application like Office wouldn't be listed there.

3) I need to get some help understanding these tools from the resource kit
better, and sadly even if I sat down with the $60 to $70 book I don't know
if I'd come away with a clear idea.

I still wonder if there is a tool from the Resource Kit
http://www.microsoft.com/office/ork/2003/tools/default.htm
like the Custom Install kit that I could have deployed to repair my MSI and
replace the missing files. I wondered about tools from the site-- the
Custom Installation Wizard,
http://www.microsoft.com/office/ork/2003/tools/BoxA03.htm
the Enhaced Office setup.exe
http://www.microsoft.com/office/ork/2003/tools/BoxA23.htm

or I wondered if the Custom Maintaince Wizard,
http://www.microsoft.com/office/ork/2003/tools/BoxA04.htm
I wondered if I could get help from the MST File Viewer
http://www.microsoft.com/office/ork/2003/tools/BoxA05.htm

I don' t really know how to use these tools even after I read the
descriptions here
http://www.microsoft.com/office/ork/2003/tools/default.htm.

4) When I took the cue of one of your links, I didn't have any quotes around
any MSI files in notepad, let alone hardly any files, and I wondered why?

Thanks so much again, because if it hadn't been for your thoughtful links I
might not have persisted in the marathon obsession to get my Office back and
come up with the idea of an out of the box way of how to get a new
competent version of MSI that could get around the problem. I may not have
been able to find a way to repair MSI 2.0 although maybe there is a site out
there--I'll have to look, but geting 3.0 worked out well. There's an
example where using a Beta fixed a major problem.

Thanks very much again, Mary. I really like Office. I just need to work to
learn much more about the components so I can realize some of its potential.

Chad Harris>>
 
C

Chad Harris

Hey Bob--

Away from PC for few days sorry it took so long to get back. I didn't do an
upgrade. I had Office XP and I took MOS 2003 setup option to uninstall.
When I used the MSI Installer Beta to repair or add enough files to allow me
to get a 1911 error in the Office setup, that achieved exactly what I was
looking for--a way to kick Wisptis out during the install. I realize now I
would have been better off just to take away Wisptis' permissions. After I
got Office 2003 in, I decided since I had uninstalled One Note to use it's
SP1 beta, and although I backed it up, I'm still not sure all of the One
Note pages have returned--but One Note had the same Wisptis knocking at the
door, and I used the 1911 dialogue to ignore it. I think that any Office
program you'd try to put in, including Front Page would try to install it.

I did retain the setup log files, (I'm pretty sure)--because I remember
saying yes to any dialogue box on keeping them, and tomorrow I will email
them along with steps I took and the confusion I'm running into trying to
repair the old MSI alongside a new one if that can be done--I'm getting a
little confused by some of the folders. I'll post the MSI problem here.
You're right, I used the pre-release RC1 MSI 3 a bit out of desparation
because I was trying to grab at anything that would let me get Office back
in at that point, and I hoped that it would be far enough along that it
wouldn't produced any huge problems. I think the lesson there was that
good ideas from sites with several good ideas can with unsupported removal
tools can often lead to undesired consequences. And I didn't think I had
anywhere to turn for a installer "upgrade" or to download MSI 2.0 into XP
although there might be a place with a way.

I'm getting a 1719 error "The Windows Installer Service Cannot Be
Accessed"( though trying to put NAV back in (I was trying to get it
completely out of the way to maximize Office's chances of installing) so I
tried this without much success:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;[LN];315346

I tried both methods, but couldn't get the command prompt command suggested
to work for some reason.

Thanks,

Chad Harris

____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top