IMO, MSFT should have kept it simple as it was with Pub 2000 and prior
versions. When they added it to the Office group, they took a basic coding
engine and messed it up. The original idea was good I think. If you were a
beginner, a hobbyist, or a small business that already used Publisher for
DTP and producing marketing materials, and only wanted a web presence in the
form of a simple, small, static website, and did not have the time to learn
new software, or the budget to buy the software or hire a site built, the
ability to produce webs was handy. You could simply convert your marketing
flyer to a web page...you could post your location, services and contact
information. You could use the DTP skill set you already had to build a
basic website. I think that MSFT also planned on people moving on to FP when
they got more serious. Unfortunately, they didn't plan the migration well.
You will never find me arguing that any large web development should be done
with Publisher, but I do think it can be a good choice in some cases, and
that FP and EW would be overkill and unnecessary. And I have seen some very
effective sites built with Publisher...code bloat and all.
DavidF