D
Dickie Worton
Hi!
Not sure if anyone can help with this one at all...
I have a large spreadsheet into which I have added a column containing a
COUNTIF function to count how many iterations of a value appear in that
column. Here it is:
=COUNTIF($B$9:$B$1271,B146)
However, I also have filters applied on this worksheet to help me identify
records that meet a particular criteria. The problem I have is that if I
filter on values in column C, D, etc, the function above doesn't adjust to
take account of the fact that some of the records (rows) are now hidden, e.g.
if a value appears 10 times in column B, but only four times with the filter
applied, the function will still return a value of '10'.
Is there any way to make the COUNTIF function have the characteristics of a
SUBTOTAL function, i.e. to ignore hidden rows when returning a value? I think
some other postings on here may have asked the same thing (in a roundabout
way) & the suggested response was to use the data in a pivot table instead.
However, I was hoping not to go down that route (yet)...
Any help gratefully received.....
Thanks,
Dickie
Not sure if anyone can help with this one at all...
I have a large spreadsheet into which I have added a column containing a
COUNTIF function to count how many iterations of a value appear in that
column. Here it is:
=COUNTIF($B$9:$B$1271,B146)
However, I also have filters applied on this worksheet to help me identify
records that meet a particular criteria. The problem I have is that if I
filter on values in column C, D, etc, the function above doesn't adjust to
take account of the fact that some of the records (rows) are now hidden, e.g.
if a value appears 10 times in column B, but only four times with the filter
applied, the function will still return a value of '10'.
Is there any way to make the COUNTIF function have the characteristics of a
SUBTOTAL function, i.e. to ignore hidden rows when returning a value? I think
some other postings on here may have asked the same thing (in a roundabout
way) & the suggested response was to use the data in a pivot table instead.
However, I was hoping not to go down that route (yet)...
Any help gratefully received.....
Thanks,
Dickie