Steve said:
Thanks for that Jonathan. I'm actually writing a component maintenance
manual in the aerospace sector. My company and I are bound by the
aerospace
specification ATA2200 for writing CMM's. The CMM is required to have a
LEP.
I appreciate your advice on how we should write and manage the manuals and
I'll pass your comments onto the Air Transport Association of America.
I'm well aware of the situation - I have done consulting work for a regional
airline (I shan't say which one) and found this precise problem. I'm not in
the least bit surprised that the issue you have is in the aerospace
industry.
You might want to check with the ATAA whether the LEP is in fact mandatory
if the manual is not in a ring-binder and is intended to be updated by
replacement of the entire document rather than of individual pages. In such
cases, an LEP has no purpose and provides no quality, traceability of
reliability benefit.
Meanwhile do you have any knowlege on how I can automate the List of
Effective pages?
Unfortunately, it is pretty much impossible in Word, for the reasons I
explained before. With the regional airline I worked with, I managed a
kludge, to the effect that the printed copy was the master, and that the
Word document (with all pages showing the current date) was merely source
material for the update of the master paper copy. It was then possible to
use VBA to do a page-by-page comparison of the current and previous versions
of the document, and thus generate an update to the LEP. But it was a
substantial amount of code, and never worked well in the hands of the people
who were updating the manuals, who knew all about what needed to be changed
in the operating procedures, but were relatively untrained in using Word.
Eventually, they agreed on a change of approach, moving towards electronic
distribution of documentation, with whole-document updates, and got
agreement from their regulatory authorities that in such a circumstance the
LEP was unnecessary. A well-presented case to the ATAA should be able to
achieve the same result.