C
Colin Higbie
I am running Word 2002 (XP) on Windows XP Pro.
I have a numbered list using the standard Style-based numbered list built into
Word 2002. In various places I refer to the numbered list items as in: "blah
blah, as defined in Section 3..." where the 3 is just a Cross Reference to the
3 in the list. That way, if I later insert a new #2, the one in the list will
update correctly and automatically to 4.
However, when I put in the Cross Reference it said 2 instead of 3, even though
it even said 3 in the Cross Reference list where I select the paragraph to use
for the reference. I tried selecting and pressing F9 and Alt-F9. No change. I
tried inserting Cross Reference to #4, it also came up and said 2. I saved,
closed, and restarted Word, no change. Then suddenly I inserted another one
and it was correct. The old one was still wrong, and the F9 refreshes still
did not work. I replaced it with the newly working Cross Reference.
While I'm glad that it started working in the end, I'm very worried that these
references will screw up again in the future. Is this a known issue? Is there
a sensitivity to Cross References and/or numbered lists I need to be aware of?
Thanks,
Colin
I have a numbered list using the standard Style-based numbered list built into
Word 2002. In various places I refer to the numbered list items as in: "blah
blah, as defined in Section 3..." where the 3 is just a Cross Reference to the
3 in the list. That way, if I later insert a new #2, the one in the list will
update correctly and automatically to 4.
However, when I put in the Cross Reference it said 2 instead of 3, even though
it even said 3 in the Cross Reference list where I select the paragraph to use
for the reference. I tried selecting and pressing F9 and Alt-F9. No change. I
tried inserting Cross Reference to #4, it also came up and said 2. I saved,
closed, and restarted Word, no change. Then suddenly I inserted another one
and it was correct. The old one was still wrong, and the F9 refreshes still
did not work. I replaced it with the newly working Cross Reference.
While I'm glad that it started working in the end, I'm very worried that these
references will screw up again in the future. Is this a known issue? Is there
a sensitivity to Cross References and/or numbered lists I need to be aware of?
Thanks,
Colin