T
tfskelly
I think this is appropriate for this group, so here goes:
I'm creating my first access database for my job. It is a
computer/software catalog where I want to keep track of about 20-30
computers and servers, the software they currently have installed on
them, when the software was installed, the specifications of the
individual computers, network information for the computers and
servers, and a catalog of all the software and licenses we have
available. I know this has been done before, but they're paying me to
do so I figure "Get paid to learn? Sure!" My question is this:
What is good practice for table layout? Should I make one large table
with ALL network/hardware/software information? Or break the tables up
as small as possible?
I'm leaning towards breaking them up into small tables because I have
many canidates for primary key for each table(ip address, hostname,
inventory#, license#, primary user). Any suggestions/tips would be
appreciated.
I'm creating my first access database for my job. It is a
computer/software catalog where I want to keep track of about 20-30
computers and servers, the software they currently have installed on
them, when the software was installed, the specifications of the
individual computers, network information for the computers and
servers, and a catalog of all the software and licenses we have
available. I know this has been done before, but they're paying me to
do so I figure "Get paid to learn? Sure!" My question is this:
What is good practice for table layout? Should I make one large table
with ALL network/hardware/software information? Or break the tables up
as small as possible?
I'm leaning towards breaking them up into small tables because I have
many canidates for primary key for each table(ip address, hostname,
inventory#, license#, primary user). Any suggestions/tips would be
appreciated.