Elly,
Sorry I was not more clear about the master/background. There is no Master
Page feature in Pub 2000, so you do not have the option of putting your
navbar on a master page, nor should you do this in Pub 2003+. It breaks the
page in FF and other browsers and does not give consistent results even in
IE. Having a means to use the Master Page where you can put the navbar on
each page is certainly a feature that would be handy, but right now it is
not cross browser compatible.
Nor can you put a navbar in the background using Pub 2000. If you add a page
to your site, you can opt to duplicate a page, which will copy the
navbar...and everything else on the page. If I add a link to a manually
built navbar such as yours, I copy the new navbar, go to old pages, select
the entire old navbar and paste without deleting the old navbar first. It
usually pastes in the correct spot on the page without needing to move it.
Of course if you have something below the navbar, it could overlap and you
would need to move that design element down to accommodate the longer
navbar.
Border...well son of a gun, you are right. I learned something today. I
tried off and on for a long time trying to get a border on just one side of
a text box, and had never been successful. I always got a border around the
whole text box when I tried. But today when I tried it again, I was able to
do it. I am guessing that I just didn't do the steps in the correct sequence
before. Thanks. That opens up some design/layouts that I have wanted to do,
but couldn't before.
I am still guessing the reason the border isn't showing up on your page has
to do with not enough space for the text box. Just give it a bit more
distance from the image above and the text box below and see if that fixes
it...or better yet, try the following first.
As per the formatting of the text and the extra spacing between lines, I am
now thinking it and probably even the problem with your border can be fixed
another way. Publisher 2000 has a different html coding engine than all the
newer versions, and my experience has been that it produces code that is
cleaner, more basic and is much more cross browser compatible. It also has
the capability of producing two different sets of code. Go to File > Web
properties. On that dialog you will see two Target Audience options. You are
using the one for IE4 or netscape 4 or higher. Select the more basic code
option of IE3 or netscape 3 or higher. Now Save as a web page and look at
your spacing in FF. When I do choose the IE4+, I get the extra spacing. When
I use the IE3+ I don't. I also use unicode (utf-8) in case that makes any
difference. I don't know how this will affect the rest of your layout, but I
get a more consistent layout in both browsers. David Bartosik had told me to
use the IE3 setting to fix some other problem I was having at the time,
which I cannot remember now...
Speaking of the new laptop, here is another tip. Right click your display >
properties > to open the display properties dialog. Settings > Advanced >
and make sure the dpi setting is set at 96 dpi vs. 120 dpi. Publisher
outputs at 96 and if you have your display set at 120, you will get a page
where all the images and the page width are 25% bigger in FF, and it will
throw off your layout.
As per the browser stats, the people that use FF won't stay on your site
because it renders poorly, and that is at least part of the reason you don't
have a higher percent. Check out this page...FF is up to 44.4%....and more
people are using Chrome than Opera now:
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
DavidF