M
Mark
All,
Our department is split, and some of us have ACC2000, others have ACC2003. I
use ACC2000 for the database development, but the people who use this
database use ACC2003.
What we've noticed is that the database needs to be repaired 3-4 times a
week. Other issues creep up that cause even bigger problems. Generally, we
backup the database nightly since on a couple occasions, it's been corrupted
beyond repair.
I want to make a case for everyone to use office 2003. My question is, can I
blame the need for repairing the database on that (using ACC2000 to develop,
and 2003 to use)? If so, are there any microsoft articles saying that using
both versions to access an .mdb isn't recommended?
Our department is split, and some of us have ACC2000, others have ACC2003. I
use ACC2000 for the database development, but the people who use this
database use ACC2003.
What we've noticed is that the database needs to be repaired 3-4 times a
week. Other issues creep up that cause even bigger problems. Generally, we
backup the database nightly since on a couple occasions, it's been corrupted
beyond repair.
I want to make a case for everyone to use office 2003. My question is, can I
blame the need for repairing the database on that (using ACC2000 to develop,
and 2003 to use)? If so, are there any microsoft articles saying that using
both versions to access an .mdb isn't recommended?