J
JT Klipfer
Hi,
I have a rather large document in which I'm creating two indices: one for
acronyms {\f "a"} and the other for definitions {\f "d"}. I'm using the \t
switch to contain either the acronym description or the word/phrase
definition, since I don't really want page numbers to show. The problem
however, lies in when I try to apply different Index styles to my {INDEX}
field.
For the {INDEX \f "a"} acronym index, I've chosen an indented index type so
that the acronyms & associated descriptions appear in a columnar fashion;
I've modified Index 1 style to meet this desire.
But for the {INDEX \f "d"} field, I've tried to do a run-in type of index
and I've tried to click the Modify button to choose Index 2 style, but I
can't seem to get that selection to stick. Somehow it keeps defaulting back
to Index 1, which is formatted for my acronym list.
I have found a workaround by manually reformatting my definitions list with
my desired formatting and then locking the field. But this really sort of
defeats the purpose of automating it all. Any help would be greatly
appreciated!
--JT
I have a rather large document in which I'm creating two indices: one for
acronyms {\f "a"} and the other for definitions {\f "d"}. I'm using the \t
switch to contain either the acronym description or the word/phrase
definition, since I don't really want page numbers to show. The problem
however, lies in when I try to apply different Index styles to my {INDEX}
field.
For the {INDEX \f "a"} acronym index, I've chosen an indented index type so
that the acronyms & associated descriptions appear in a columnar fashion;
I've modified Index 1 style to meet this desire.
But for the {INDEX \f "d"} field, I've tried to do a run-in type of index
and I've tried to click the Modify button to choose Index 2 style, but I
can't seem to get that selection to stick. Somehow it keeps defaulting back
to Index 1, which is formatted for my acronym list.
I have found a workaround by manually reformatting my definitions list with
my desired formatting and then locking the field. But this really sort of
defeats the purpose of automating it all. Any help would be greatly
appreciated!
--JT