Z
zofficedepot
Let me confess right now that I have trouble with the difference (if
any) between a message .Text and .Body. Anyway, in that regard, or in
some other, are there more than one kind of message body? With OL03
searches I find that it finds strings inconsistently in what I would
call the body. Some bodies are searched, and some are not. I'm so
furious I'm about to write my own search, because I don't know what to
believe from OL's.
I can at least reproduce it on demand with a "tracking receipt." I can
open it, ctrl-A, copy, paste to new message, and save (as draft).
Then a search finds strings in the copy(draft) but not the original.
This happens in both the "simple" search (non-advanced) (using the
input box and dropdown right on the mail folder display page), or
using advanced, and saying "subject+body" or "frequent fields." (Yes,
I know how to set the scope of the search.)
My theory is that there is are some "bodies" - or "body parts" that
really aren't bodies, according to search
In this case I've shown
a tracking receipt, which is not being considered to have a searchable
body. A possible further clue is how spell-check knows to stop when
it reaches quoted text. How does it know? Is there some flagging of
"system text" vs. "user text" or whatever?
At the moment I can't remember another scenario for you to reproduce
this (I've block out the screaming fury from previous times it's
happened), and I can shout back again when I find another one - but
does someone already recognize the queerness in play here?
any) between a message .Text and .Body. Anyway, in that regard, or in
some other, are there more than one kind of message body? With OL03
searches I find that it finds strings inconsistently in what I would
call the body. Some bodies are searched, and some are not. I'm so
furious I'm about to write my own search, because I don't know what to
believe from OL's.
I can at least reproduce it on demand with a "tracking receipt." I can
open it, ctrl-A, copy, paste to new message, and save (as draft).
Then a search finds strings in the copy(draft) but not the original.
This happens in both the "simple" search (non-advanced) (using the
input box and dropdown right on the mail folder display page), or
using advanced, and saying "subject+body" or "frequent fields." (Yes,
I know how to set the scope of the search.)
My theory is that there is are some "bodies" - or "body parts" that
really aren't bodies, according to search
In this case I've showna tracking receipt, which is not being considered to have a searchable
body. A possible further clue is how spell-check knows to stop when
it reaches quoted text. How does it know? Is there some flagging of
"system text" vs. "user text" or whatever?
At the moment I can't remember another scenario for you to reproduce
this (I've block out the screaming fury from previous times it's
happened), and I can shout back again when I find another one - but
does someone already recognize the queerness in play here?