E
ElPresidente
I was reading over the Microsoft Access security FAQ, but I didn't
understand why one would set permissions via code as opposed to simply
creating two workgroup files and restricting the user group. The
latter option seems much easier and straightforward. Is this just a
matter of more detailed control or am I missing something?
I'm trying to prevent users from adding/editing/deleting records from
the database itself or any linked databases. The only way for a user
to add/modify a record would be to go through a .NET front-end app I
wrote (which would connect under the admin group using the workgroup
file). Am I going about this correctly?
Thanks
understand why one would set permissions via code as opposed to simply
creating two workgroup files and restricting the user group. The
latter option seems much easier and straightforward. Is this just a
matter of more detailed control or am I missing something?
I'm trying to prevent users from adding/editing/deleting records from
the database itself or any linked databases. The only way for a user
to add/modify a record would be to go through a .NET front-end app I
wrote (which would connect under the admin group using the workgroup
file). Am I going about this correctly?
Thanks