Naaahhh... It's just Phillip flogging a horse that died ten years ago
Word inserts hyperlinks just fine in 2008. Try it: Insert some hyperlinks
on a page and save it as a Web Page: the hyperlinks will be alive and well.
Now save the same document as PDF, and they're deleted. That's Adobe's
fault.
Adobe can't be bothered updating its import filter to import the Word .docx
format (or, I assume, the OpenOffice ODF format, since they treat Hyperlinks
exactly the same...)
Microsoft's part of this blame is the TOC generator in Mac Office. For
about ten years now, Microsoft has been "getting away with" shipping the
'old' TOC generator from Word 97, which was replaced by the TOC generator in
Word 2000.
The 'old' one does not generate hyperlinks, only cross-references.
The Word 2000 TOC generator generates both. Microsoft has been avoiding
porting the new version to the Mac, to save money.
Adobe has been getting away with blaming Microsoft for their feeble attempt
at Acrobat on the Mac ever since. And Adobe will continue to get away with
this until Microsoft fixes the TOC generator. Because many users can't
distinguish between "hyperlinks that do not transport to PDF" (Adobe's
Problem) and "a TOC generator that does not generate hyperlinks"
(Microsoft's problem).
Given that both companies charge several hundred dollars for their product,
you would think they might make them work, one day...
If you have the full version of Adobe Acrobat, it will attempt to "guess"
where the hyperlinks are, by looking at the text. Anything beginning
"
http://..." will get a hyperlink. Of course, that doesn't work in a TOC,
because the hyperlinks are not visible in the printable text.
Cheers
phillip, thx for that but i dont understand most of what u say. r u saying
this is a political issue? there is no way i am going to manually re-create
hundreds of links (and that's just for one document). first off, I don't
really know where they all are unless i go line by line comparing both
documents. the TOCs alone with the docs i deal with are pages long and
original authors have used cross-refs liberally, as they should. then there
are indexes and the like as well. this is nuts! i think it's clear this is in
MS's court (what's a macBU?). but if i read u, u are saying the code's not
there, so i am just crying over spilt milk? Well, thx for any advice that i
can use to get links working in PDFs (en masse) from mac word docs...
jigs
--
Don't wait for your answer, click here:
http://www.word.mvps.org/
Please reply in the group. Please do NOT email me unless I ask you to.
John McGhie, Microsoft MVP, Word and Word:Mac
Sydney, Australia. mailto:
[email protected]