sony654 said:
if a = 5.00 (TY earnings)
if b = 0.00 (LY earnings)
the percent change is (a-b)/b is really a 100% increase, not DIV/0!
and if a=-5.00, then it's a 100% decrease.
WRONG!
If this year's earnings are 5.0, they'd represent a 100% increase over last
year's earnings if last year's earnings were 2.5.
And a 400% increase if last year's earnings were 1.0.
And a 999900% increase if last year's earnings were 0.0005.
And so on.
If last year's earnings were zero (or negative), there's no mathematically
meaningful percentage change (whether there's a 'liberal arts' percentage
change is irrelevant). That's why financial statements show something like
NMF (for not meaningful) in such situations.
=IF(b29=0,100%,(a29-b29)/b29)
.... what if a29 is negative
There's a meaningless negative percentage change. Signs matter. A negative
percentage change is a GOOD THING if the starting value is negative, a bad
thing when the starting value is positive. This is the problem with
percentages when used by nonmathematicians. Laymen improperly think of
percentages as additive when, in fact, they're multiplicative.