does copyright sign © mess up rule processing?

[james]

I received a spam with this line

From: © drugname blah blah [[email protected]]

So I created a rule in outlook to move all email with drugname in the header
into junk folder. Strangely, when I run it now, it does not remove the
offending spam from my inbox.

Is the copyright symbol a backdoor to escape outlook rule processing?

(this is a repost; previous one did not show up)

 

[VanguardLH]

I received a spam with this line

From: © drugname blah blah [[email protected]]

So I created a rule in outlook to move all email with drugname in the header
into junk folder. Strangely, when I run it now, it does not remove the
offending spam from my inbox.

Is the copyright symbol a backdoor to escape outlook rule processing?

It is possible the sender is using UTF encoding for their username (a
comment field in the From header). What you see in Outlook and most
other e-mail clients is the rendered version of the UTF string, not the
code for it which looks something like ?=...= followed by the e-mail
address field. So what you see to define your rule is not what is
actually in that header. I don't know if Outlook lets you look at the
raw source of an e-mail (as does Outlook Express using Ctrl+F3); that
is, what is shown in View -> Options might also be the rendered version
of the UTF encoding.

(this is a repost; previous one did not show up)

Yes it did. 6 hours before your new post here.