don't use Pub 2003 for web pages

[darius]

I've been using Publisher 2000 since it came out and I'm very happy with
it. And, I thought I "should" upgrade to 2003. After all, newer is
better, right?

I'm sure glad I didn't.

I've talked to several people who have and they are not happy with
2003's web publishing problems. And, after reading the general comments
here about it, I decided to keep plugging away at 2000. It does the job
and so..

Anyhow, thanks to all here who helped me make this decision and I'll
continue to read here and hopefully contribute as I can.

PeterL

 

[David Bartosik [MSFT MVP]]

It has been and continues to be my recommendation that 2000 be used over
2002/2003 for a serious web site despite a few new features in the latter.

David Bartosik - [MSFT MVP]
www.publishermvps.com
www.davidbartosik.com

 

[Beverly-Texas]

I already have 2003 - anyway to go back to 2000? What are the major
advantages of going back to 2000? Do pictures load faster?

It has been and continues to be my recommendation that 2000 be used over
2002/2003 for a serious web site despite a few new features in the latter.

David Bartosik - [MSFT MVP]
www.publishermvps.com
www.davidbartosik.com

I've been using Publisher 2000 since it came out and I'm very happy with
it. And, I thought I "should" upgrade to 2003. After all, newer is better,
right?

I'm sure glad I didn't.

I've talked to several people who have and they are not happy with 2003's
web publishing problems. And, after reading the general comments here
about it, I decided to keep plugging away at 2000. It does the job and
so..

Anyhow, thanks to all here who helped me make this decision and I'll
continue to read here and hopefully contribute as I can.

PeterL