T
Todd
I've recently migrated dBaseIV tables to Access 2000 for
the Paleontology Dept. of a local museum. Many fields are
not required and are therefore blank. I just ran a query
to sum up specimen numbers for to see the totals for
genus/species entries.
SELECT CMMI.NAME, Count(CMMI.NAME) AS Records,
Sum(CMMI.SPECNO) AS Specimens
FROM CMMI
GROUP BY CMMI.NAME;
For the new records entered in Access where the NAME field
was left blank, Count(CMMI.NAME) returned 0 while
Sum(CMMI.SPECNO) returned the accurate number of specimens
- a strange result. Among the 3000+ entries that were
migrated, an accurate result for Count(CMMI.NAME) is
returned. This is a problem because these two groups with
empty NAME fields should be grouped together. Why is
Access doing this?
the Paleontology Dept. of a local museum. Many fields are
not required and are therefore blank. I just ran a query
to sum up specimen numbers for to see the totals for
genus/species entries.
SELECT CMMI.NAME, Count(CMMI.NAME) AS Records,
Sum(CMMI.SPECNO) AS Specimens
FROM CMMI
GROUP BY CMMI.NAME;
For the new records entered in Access where the NAME field
was left blank, Count(CMMI.NAME) returned 0 while
Sum(CMMI.SPECNO) returned the accurate number of specimens
- a strange result. Among the 3000+ entries that were
migrated, an accurate result for Count(CMMI.NAME) is
returned. This is a problem because these two groups with
empty NAME fields should be grouped together. Why is
Access doing this?