B
bbascom
The new rules in 2003 seem quite awkward compared to previous versions, but
maybe I do not understand them yet. I get all my rules listed
individually,and in order of creation (not even alphabetically, or
user-defined, for e.g.) as opposed to grouped according to folder as before.
Worse, I get duplicate rules all the time, usually based on a designation
that one of the dups is "for other machine", which I do not not understand at
all and can find nothing about in help. But there are other dups as well some
seem to be based on upper case/lower case differences in email addresses only
(which I believe is irrelevant for email), and others dups which seem to be
simply exact copies of rules already in existence. I feel the whole rules
organization has gone from something useful to somthing that is almost more
trouble than it is worth. Help seems to say only the obvious, and not deal
with theses issues. Any ideas?
maybe I do not understand them yet. I get all my rules listed
individually,and in order of creation (not even alphabetically, or
user-defined, for e.g.) as opposed to grouped according to folder as before.
Worse, I get duplicate rules all the time, usually based on a designation
that one of the dups is "for other machine", which I do not not understand at
all and can find nothing about in help. But there are other dups as well some
seem to be based on upper case/lower case differences in email addresses only
(which I believe is irrelevant for email), and others dups which seem to be
simply exact copies of rules already in existence. I feel the whole rules
organization has gone from something useful to somthing that is almost more
trouble than it is worth. Help seems to say only the obvious, and not deal
with theses issues. Any ideas?