But if you didn't do the task where the tools are used you wouldn't have to
rent them at all. Therefore it is that task the creates the cost and
determines its amount. Costing it in the task that uses it rather than the
task that procures it actually gives you more accurate cash flows IMHO
because it allows you to better predict where in the project the need for
the cash arises. Project is, IMHO, about managing the budget in its
aggregate and not about micro-managing the dates the checks are going to get
cut or the day to day financials out to the penny.
I don't have a problem with managing some of the costs over in Excel and
linking them but I usually use it for the fixed cost component of tasks
only. Like in my favourite movie shoot example, we're scouting locations
for 1 week in Rio. The resource costs for the people (salary cost),
equipment, per-diem allowance, and expendables like film are computed by
Project. But the airfare, hotel, car-rental, incidentals, etc are totalled
in a budget worksheet in Excel and the total is OLE linked into the fixed
cost field of the "Scout Locations" task. Project then adds it in to the
resource costs to come up with the total task cost.
--
Steve House [MVP]
MS Project Trainer/Consultant
Visit
http://www.mvps.org/project/faqs.htm for the FAQs
when against
the