M
mlv
Excel column widths are starting to confuse me!
I have a workbook containing several sheets. The sheets are not identical
and have differing numbers of columns, e.g. some sheets have 9 columns,
whilst others have 11 or 14.
The margins for each sheet are exactly the same with 0 set for header and
footer. The printer setup for each page calls for 100% normal size, A4, 1
page wide by 1 page tall. The correct print area is set for each sheet.
The various column widths for each sheet, when added together, are identical
(86 units in this case, although what the 'units' are, I do not know). I
always check using print preview to ensure that the full width of the
document will print, and reduce the column widths if the preview shows the
right-hand edge clipped.
I've just had to reduce the column widths on one sheet (9 columns wide) as
the print preview showed its right-hand edge clipped. I reduced the column
widths by the minimum necessary for the print preview to show it printing
fully. However, when I printed the sheet out, it printed 10mm narrower than
one of the other sheets (14 columns wide) printed on the same printer at the
same time.
Rather bizarrely, I sometimes find that on re-opening an Excel document
where I previously had to reduce the column widths for it to print fully, I
can increase the column widths again, and it still prints OK.
Am I missing something here? Is there something else that influences column
width, or some parameter that I have not set correctly? Does, for example,
Excel increase a column width automatically, if the text in a cell is too
wide to print?
I have a workbook containing several sheets. The sheets are not identical
and have differing numbers of columns, e.g. some sheets have 9 columns,
whilst others have 11 or 14.
The margins for each sheet are exactly the same with 0 set for header and
footer. The printer setup for each page calls for 100% normal size, A4, 1
page wide by 1 page tall. The correct print area is set for each sheet.
The various column widths for each sheet, when added together, are identical
(86 units in this case, although what the 'units' are, I do not know). I
always check using print preview to ensure that the full width of the
document will print, and reduce the column widths if the preview shows the
right-hand edge clipped.
I've just had to reduce the column widths on one sheet (9 columns wide) as
the print preview showed its right-hand edge clipped. I reduced the column
widths by the minimum necessary for the print preview to show it printing
fully. However, when I printed the sheet out, it printed 10mm narrower than
one of the other sheets (14 columns wide) printed on the same printer at the
same time.
Rather bizarrely, I sometimes find that on re-opening an Excel document
where I previously had to reduce the column widths for it to print fully, I
can increase the column widths again, and it still prints OK.
Am I missing something here? Is there something else that influences column
width, or some parameter that I have not set correctly? Does, for example,
Excel increase a column width automatically, if the text in a cell is too
wide to print?