Shane and JE,
Thank you so much for your help. Do you think it then makes better
sense to
have one workbook per student?
Maria
I think that McGimpsey would be better able to provide you with an
answer than me, but I'll give you my thoughts.
It seems that the simplest thing to do would be to have one workbook
per student. This saves you wasting time creating a new workbook each
time you want to send an update. The disadvantage of this seems to be
that then all your information is in a variety of documents.
The second option is to have an all-encompassing workbook, which you
seem to have already, and then to make a copy of worksheets that you
wish to e-mail. This seems to have the advantage of having all
information in one document, and if you use a macro as Mr McGimpsey
suggests, then it will not be too much hassle to create a new workbook
for each worksheet each time. If you have not used macros before, they
are quite easy to learn use. The easiest way is to click on "Tools",
then "Macro", then "Record New Macro..." After you give the macro a
name, and, if you want, a shortcut, then all you do is perform the
operation you want it to do, and click the square stop button. It's
like recording what you want to happen. If you are willing to take the
time to do this, I think it will be rewarding in the long run. This is
the option I would pick, but then I can already use macros.
Another option would be to use links. In the same way that cells can
refer to other cells in the same worksheet, to sum them or average them
for example, cells can refer to cells in other workbooks. If, for
example, you want the cell B3 in Workbook2 to be the same as the cell
C5 in Workbook2, type "=[workbook1.xls]Sheet1!C5" in cell B3. This way
you could have a main workbook, and have others, ready to send, that
automatically update. I haven't found a way to make this much use for
what you want though.
I hope that this helps. I think that the problem is that designers,
and programmers especially, often fail to think how people are likely
to use something. It seems that instead of programs that work around
humans, humans are expected to work around programs.