R
Ronald R. Dodge, Jr.
Why did MS have the financial function of INTRATE basically use the
following formula when it's way too simplistic using the simple interest
rate rule that has no practical use in life given how money works or even
how anything else works in life:
(FV-PV)/PV/NP
FV = Redemption Amount
PV = Initial Investment Amount
NP = Number of Years (Normally thought of as number of periods during the
time period, which in this case, 1 year is one period for how the formula is
setup)
To come up with the actual interest rate using the compounding interest
method, one must use the following formula:
(FV/PV)^(1/NP)-1
Under the simple interest method the INTRATE formula uses, for cost of
living that is assumed to double every 10 years, it returns 10%
Obviously, things don't go up by 10% every year, which would mean after 10
years, things would cost 159.3742% more than what they had cost at first as
a result of PV*(1.1^10-1)
To use the formula that I have stated, MS has no financial function to use
that particular formula (at least not built into the Analysis Tookpak
Add-in).
FV/PV = 2
NP = 10
2^1/10-1 = 2^0.10-1=0.071773463
Hence the real annual effective rate for the cost of living to double every
10 years is 7.1773463%, which most people just round to 7.2%, which then has
led to the rule of 72 that says to divide 72 by the interest rate and divide
by 100.
Example:
Interest rate is 8.00%
In the computer form, it would show up as 72/.08/100
which then would say it would take 9 years to double.
Of course, rule of 72 isn't a perfect thing as it's only an estimate and
only works within a certain range. If one really want to know how many
years it would take for such investment to double at a such stated APR, then
they would need to use the following formula:
(LOG(FV)-LOG(PV))/LOG(1+R)=NP
Example
Find out how long it would take for an investment to double such as going
from 1 to 2 with a stated APR compounded only one time per year
(LOG(2)-LOG(1))/(LOG(1.08)=9.006468 years
I also have noticed Excel doesn't have this formula in it either.
--
Thanks,
Ronald R. Dodge, Jr.
Production Statistician
Master MOUS 2000
following formula when it's way too simplistic using the simple interest
rate rule that has no practical use in life given how money works or even
how anything else works in life:
(FV-PV)/PV/NP
FV = Redemption Amount
PV = Initial Investment Amount
NP = Number of Years (Normally thought of as number of periods during the
time period, which in this case, 1 year is one period for how the formula is
setup)
To come up with the actual interest rate using the compounding interest
method, one must use the following formula:
(FV/PV)^(1/NP)-1
Under the simple interest method the INTRATE formula uses, for cost of
living that is assumed to double every 10 years, it returns 10%
Obviously, things don't go up by 10% every year, which would mean after 10
years, things would cost 159.3742% more than what they had cost at first as
a result of PV*(1.1^10-1)
To use the formula that I have stated, MS has no financial function to use
that particular formula (at least not built into the Analysis Tookpak
Add-in).
FV/PV = 2
NP = 10
2^1/10-1 = 2^0.10-1=0.071773463
Hence the real annual effective rate for the cost of living to double every
10 years is 7.1773463%, which most people just round to 7.2%, which then has
led to the rule of 72 that says to divide 72 by the interest rate and divide
by 100.
Example:
Interest rate is 8.00%
In the computer form, it would show up as 72/.08/100
which then would say it would take 9 years to double.
Of course, rule of 72 isn't a perfect thing as it's only an estimate and
only works within a certain range. If one really want to know how many
years it would take for such investment to double at a such stated APR, then
they would need to use the following formula:
(LOG(FV)-LOG(PV))/LOG(1+R)=NP
Example
Find out how long it would take for an investment to double such as going
from 1 to 2 with a stated APR compounded only one time per year
(LOG(2)-LOG(1))/(LOG(1.08)=9.006468 years
I also have noticed Excel doesn't have this formula in it either.
--
Thanks,
Ronald R. Dodge, Jr.
Production Statistician
Master MOUS 2000