Hi =?Utf-8?B?RGFuaWVsZSBQaW5haQ==?=,
PS : I'm ITALIAN man ...not french lol ^_^
<LOL> Indeed! Sorry about that. I should have caught it was
but the one "l" at the end of the name! Am I forgiven
?
Thank you for the additional information. I reiterate that
there is no such thing as a Word field "MAILMERGE". If you
are really using that, it could explain why you're seeing
the current date - Word doesn't know what to do with the
field, so make it's best guess, based on the date
formatting switch, and gives you the current date.
Does it work any better if the field looks like this:
{ MERGEFIELD Data_Nascita \@ "dd/MM/yyyy" }
Further to what you're seeing: Are you using an ODBC
connection to the Access database? (Just checking, to make
sure we have all the information.)
Better might be to use a QUERY as the data source. In the
query, you can create an EXPRESSION that will format the
date exactly the way you want to have it come across in
Word. This will make it easier and faster for the user, as
they won't have to make changes to the field codes in Word
every time they set up a merge to this data.
In the first empty column of the Query grid, type something
like:
DataNascita: FORMAT([Data_Nascita], "dd/mm/yyyy")
You'll get a field in the linked data source named
DataNascita that would be used instead of Data_Nascita.
Cindy Meister
INTER-Solutions, Switzerland
http://homepage.swissonline.ch/cindymeister (last update
Sep 30 2003)
http://www.word.mvps.org
This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any
follow question or reply in the newsgroup and not by e-mail