clintonG said:
Let's see what is being said here.
What part of my comments are disagreeable? The truthful parts or the
factual parts?
If my comments were not truthful or factual why would an add-in be
needed to make FrontPage work with Visual Studio.NET 2003?
I can't accept any any 'easier' blah blah bullsh!t as a response.
State the reason the add-in is needed.
As a quick teaser:
* Suppose you could choose selected file types (i.e. cs, vb, vbproj,
csproj, sln, suo) so that they will NEVER publish when your site is
published? Sure, you can just set publish status on that file type, but
when you add new files, will you always remember? Can you afford to push
your source up to your host?
* Suppose you could ensure that Debug was False in all of your ASP.NET
pages before you deploy? (This is critically important!)
What part of your post do I disagree with? Inline:
[clintonG said]
The main disadvantage is the fact that FrontPage is NOT genuinely
integrated
nor does it genuinely interoperate with any release of Visual Studio. The
How do you define "interoperate"? It is quite easy to open a site in
FrontPage and VS.NET at the same time and edit in each. However, they
really aren't supposed to interoperate. As long as each one of them was
designed to provide UI functionality for ASP.NET, that's all that is
required.
fact that Visual Studio.NET 2003 has a 'Designer' that mangles and
deletes
HTML source does not make for a great experience causing lots of wasted
time
and anguish. So using FrontPage 2003 to develop ASP.NET applications
remains
a wasteful and costly work in progress.
I disagree with that simply because that's what I do with my site and I
never have any problems. I've been doing it for over 2 years now.
Does VS.NET 7.x have designer issues? Yes, it does. However, it doesn't
have any issues with the HTML created by FrontPage in my experience. I do
know the issues involving the designer, I know why they happen, and I know
how to effectively work around them should I encounter them. Truth is
that I don't.
Everything remains a work-around as
there is pithy support for developing ASP.NET when using FrontPage. The
documents at [1],[2] and [3] should be reviewed. More documents from
others
reading this topic are welcome.
Are you sure that pithy is the word you wanted here? If it is, then
that's one statement we can agree upon.
--
Jim Cheshire
JIMCO
http://www.jimcoaddins.com
New Spawn Version!
Version 1.9.6 adds new features!
Get it today FREE at:
http://www.jimcoaddins.com