D
DaveL
I work in a technical publications group and the standard in our office for
years has been Visio to .emf to Framemaker, so we have thousands of graphics
in emf format, and the emf files import into Framemaker at the same size as
the original Visio file.
I've recently been upgraded to XP Pro (from 2000), Office 2003, and
Framemaker 7.1p116. Now when I create a new graphic or edit an existing
graphic using Visio 2003, save it as an emf and import it by reference into
Frame, it comes in about 120% larger than the original Visio file. The same
is true for emf files exported from Adobe Illustrator. However, if I insert
that same emf from Visio into Word 2003, it comes in at the correct size. I'm
not about to ask the writers I work with to scale every graphic they get from
me, and I'm not about to start changing every graphic I work on to 84%
smaller so it comes in at the right size. And, as emf has been our standard
and thousands of our Frame files reference emf files, it would be very
difficult and inconvenient to switch to a different format. Have you heard of
this similar problem before? Do you know what is going on and is there a
simple fix??...patch, graphics filter...go back to Win2000??
Any help and advise would be appreciated.
years has been Visio to .emf to Framemaker, so we have thousands of graphics
in emf format, and the emf files import into Framemaker at the same size as
the original Visio file.
I've recently been upgraded to XP Pro (from 2000), Office 2003, and
Framemaker 7.1p116. Now when I create a new graphic or edit an existing
graphic using Visio 2003, save it as an emf and import it by reference into
Frame, it comes in about 120% larger than the original Visio file. The same
is true for emf files exported from Adobe Illustrator. However, if I insert
that same emf from Visio into Word 2003, it comes in at the correct size. I'm
not about to ask the writers I work with to scale every graphic they get from
me, and I'm not about to start changing every graphic I work on to 84%
smaller so it comes in at the right size. And, as emf has been our standard
and thousands of our Frame files reference emf files, it would be very
difficult and inconvenient to switch to a different format. Have you heard of
this similar problem before? Do you know what is going on and is there a
simple fix??...patch, graphics filter...go back to Win2000??
Any help and advise would be appreciated.