CyberTaz said:
Many of those who relied on the add-in may not be able to devise such a
workbook of their own by creating the necessary functions - I *know* I
couldn't, at least not without devoting far more time than I'm able.
TOUCHY!?!? You wanna see TOUCHY!?!?!? At least I said "baloney"!!!
<vbseg>
OK, I'm a little sensitive - but seeing people complaining about "not
being able to do stats" without the ATP is a real peeve.
What you point out is precisely the more-than-potential problem that I
see all the time with my academic clients.
<rant>
While *some* users know enough about statistics to make the ATP a great
shortcut, a *lot* of people use it as a crutch, ignorant of the
underlying functions, and seemingly content to assume that the fact that
the ATP can produce *a* result means that it's a *valid* result.
I recognize how convenient the wizards are.
But, for just one example, I can't tell you how many times I've seen
t-tests used in biological, economic and social science applications
BECAUSE THE ATP MAKES IT EASY, even when it's COMPLETELY inappropriate
with their small non-Gaussian distributions.
If one *can't* produce the same results with functions, then I submit
that they *shouldn't* produce them with the ATP.
</rant>