Peter,
What your hold on to and what you let go matters not to me.
Back to your question. "Under what _possible_ circumstances is this
preferable to Suzanne's two-keystroke solution to the problem?"
It could be that you are simply dazed and reeling from your recent
spankings, but for a person supposedly skilled in a gazillion different
languages you seem particularly dense when is comes to comprehending plain
English. Suzanne offered a correct and perfectly sensible answer to the
OP's original question and I felt that she took care to state that her
answer was conditional. That condition being: "If hyperlinks are the only
fields in the document." I think a reasonable person could conclude that if
hyperlinks are not the only fields in the document then the process that
Suzanne provided may not produce the desired result.
The possible circumstance being the OP has copied a list containing
hyperlink fields into a document that contains other types of fields.
Now your statement: "So your "solution" solves a problem the OP didn't ask
about."
The OP did not state that there are other fields and the OP did not state
that there are not other fields. At this point we don't know if there are
other fields or not. There may be other fields and there may not be other
fields. We may never hear from the OP again and never know if there are
other fields or not. In any case you are correct, my solution solves a
problem that the OP didn't ask about.
So my high crime is solving a problem that the OP didn't ask about. Is this
the point that you have taken so much effort to highlight and drive home?
Bask in the glory of your small victory Peter.
--
Greg Maxey - Word MVP
My web site
http://gregmaxey.mvps.org
So your "solution" solves a problem the OP didn't ask about.
As I said, I was going to let this go, but you chose to engage in your
standard nasty discourse in another thread.