E
Ed Marmon
many contact managers have specs assoiated with how many records can be
handled well until some sort of speed degradation occurs even on good
cpu/ram machines due to whatever the database technology is.
MSDE i though can do more and faster than things like dBase, etc. I
remember the old Act! 6.0 contact manager was QA tested at about 50,000
contacts, but that was clipper or whatever, and not the capability of sql
( msde )
What are some stats on what BCM is capable of? Does speed decrease at large
numbers of contacts?
Thanks.
( PS- I know outlook 2003 is spec'd at something like 4 billion or 16
billion records in unicode, so, it it actually build for more speed and
size, technically, than BCM??? )
(PPS- whatever happened to outlookforum.com )???
handled well until some sort of speed degradation occurs even on good
cpu/ram machines due to whatever the database technology is.
MSDE i though can do more and faster than things like dBase, etc. I
remember the old Act! 6.0 contact manager was QA tested at about 50,000
contacts, but that was clipper or whatever, and not the capability of sql
( msde )
What are some stats on what BCM is capable of? Does speed decrease at large
numbers of contacts?
Thanks.
( PS- I know outlook 2003 is spec'd at something like 4 billion or 16
billion records in unicode, so, it it actually build for more speed and
size, technically, than BCM??? )
(PPS- whatever happened to outlookforum.com )???