L
Lateral
Hi guys
Here is the scenario.
I have developed a small Access application and have split the databases to
that the data is seperate....so far so good.
I want to install the app on 2 PC's that are connected via a small
Workgroup. Let's call these PC's PC1 and PC2. I wanted to have the data
backend on PC1 and have PC2 map to the corresponding drive/folder on PC1. If
I map the drive from PC2 to PC1 as X: I can use the Linked Table Manager to
specify that the data backend is on X:. This is fine for PC2 but is I want to
use the same application for PC1 this is a problem as PC1 does not know
anything about X: as the data backend is stored "locally".
Each PC (PC1 and PC2) will be using the Access Runtime so therefore I can
not use the Linked Table Manager on each PC.
My understanding is that if I have used the Linked Table Manager to "tell"
the application where the data backend is ie: X: , then the application will
always look for the data backend on X:.
I am sure that there is a way around this issue and look forward to your
replies.
Thanks
Regards
Greg
Here is the scenario.
I have developed a small Access application and have split the databases to
that the data is seperate....so far so good.
I want to install the app on 2 PC's that are connected via a small
Workgroup. Let's call these PC's PC1 and PC2. I wanted to have the data
backend on PC1 and have PC2 map to the corresponding drive/folder on PC1. If
I map the drive from PC2 to PC1 as X: I can use the Linked Table Manager to
specify that the data backend is on X:. This is fine for PC2 but is I want to
use the same application for PC1 this is a problem as PC1 does not know
anything about X: as the data backend is stored "locally".
Each PC (PC1 and PC2) will be using the Access Runtime so therefore I can
not use the Linked Table Manager on each PC.
My understanding is that if I have used the Linked Table Manager to "tell"
the application where the data backend is ie: X: , then the application will
always look for the data backend on X:.
I am sure that there is a way around this issue and look forward to your
replies.
Thanks
Regards
Greg