Diane said:
It doesn't work like that in my Outlook - depending on which account I use,
I can send BCC without a name in the To or CC field and my own address is
not automatically added to the To field. Adding ian address to the to field
helps keep it out of spam filters.
Works that way in OL2002. The OP never mentioned *which* version of
Outlook he/she uses. You don't get a comment (name) field included in
the To field (in the copy sent to the mail server), just the
"<yourmail>" entry (i.e., your e-mail address enclosed within angle
brackets). Which version of Outlook do you have? Did you send a test
e-mail to a different e-mail account (like another one that you have)
and look at its raw source using the webmail interface to your account
(and NOT download it into Outlook to look at it there)? Microsoft
might've changed the behavior of Outlook sometime after version 2002.
The To header is optional. If a spam filter is scoring negatively an
e-mail because it has a blank To field then that spam filter is not RFC
compliant. But then I've seen spam filters that tag e-mails that have
"Undisclosed Recipients" as the comment in the To header (which Outlook
Express will add if the To header is left blank).