How to show & print gridlines in .htm from .xls.

[Shelly F]

I am saving an excel worksheet as filename.htm
The worksheet has gridlines turned on, they show and print in
filename.xls but not in filename.htm
Any way to have the gridlines show and print in filename.htm?
Anti-Spam: Change shellyfnospam to shellyf to respond. Thanx, y'all have a nice day!
Retired to Cyberspace from Green Valley, AZ.

 

[JE McGimpsey]

Same answer as when you asked the exact same question yesterday.

check it out at the archives:

http://google.com/groups?&as_uauthors=shelly f&as_scoring=d

 

[Shelly F]

Thank y'all for the response - however today I asked the question on
microsoft .public.excel.misc, yesterday I asked the quesion on
microsoft.public.excel; and tomorrow I will be asking the question on
microsoft.public.worksheet.functions; then I will quit asking the
question because I will feel as though I covered all bases. Please
feel free to put me in y'alls kill list.
I received y'alls response, now let me decide if y'alls is the only
response to be considered.
Y'all have a nice day.........

Same answer as when you asked the exact same question yesterday.

check it out at the archives:

http://google.com/groups?&as_uauthors=shelly f&as_scoring=d

Anti-Spam: Change shellyfnospam to shellyf to respond. Thanx, y'all have a nice day!
Retired to Cyberspace from Green Valley, AZ.

 

[dwojtowi]

If you look at the "Anouncement: Posting guidelines" the third poin
states:

3) No double posting.

A post in a single forum should be enough to get a response

 

[Dave Peterson]

Most of the regulars will read those newsgroups. If you really want to post to
those (and it's not necessary!), put all the newsgroups in your header and send
just one message.

But multiposting isn't helpful to you or the responders. It wastes their time
and means that you have multiple groups to go back to review.

And if your post sparked other ideas, you won't get that give and take from
everyone. And the solution may be less than optimum.

Don't be surprised if you get another response to your next message that's very
similar to J.E.'s response today.

I read it as more of a warning not to waste my time since you already have an
answer elsewhere. I think most read it the same way.

 

[Shelly F]

With all due respect, I did not double post. I posted once on each of
two newsgroups, once on each of two days.
Does the posting guidelines reference providing information relative
to the thread in question so that others know what y'all are
responding to? I think so -in any case, this is my last response to
the subject.
Thank y'all for the opportuity to ask what I consider to be a valid
technical question, please let others respond to the original posted
question.
Have a nice day............

If you look at the "Anouncement: Posting guidelines" the third point
states:

3) No double posting.

A post in a single forum should be enough to get a response.

Anti-Spam: Change shellyfnospam to shellyf to respond. Thanx, y'all have a nice day!
Retired to Cyberspace from Green Valley, AZ.

 

[JE McGimpsey]

Most of the regulars read at least .misc, .worksheet.functions, and
..programming. And they aren't shy about correcting a reply that's wrong
or incomplete.

I can't speak for them, but when I see a post that is identical to
another post that I know has been answered, I assume that a) the poster
didn't bother, or didn't know how to check for an answer to the previous
post, or b) that they simply didn't like the answer.

Since you've been posting for quite a while, I guessed that it wasn't
the former.

Most posters who are successful in the latter case refer to that answer
and explain why it's inadequate. At the least, this demonstrates that
the poster read and considered the response. That may inspire someone to
come up with a better answer. Simply posting again, at least for me,
doesn't.

 

[Shelly F]

OK, thanx, response works, case closed.

Most of the regulars read at least .misc, .worksheet.functions, and
.programming. And they aren't shy about correcting a reply that's wrong
or incomplete.

I can't speak for them, but when I see a post that is identical to
another post that I know has been answered, I assume that a) the poster
didn't bother, or didn't know how to check for an answer to the previous
post, or b) that they simply didn't like the answer.

Since you've been posting for quite a while, I guessed that it wasn't
the former.

Most posters who are successful in the latter case refer to that answer
and explain why it's inadequate. At the least, this demonstrates that
the poster read and considered the response. That may inspire someone to
come up with a better answer. Simply posting again, at least for me,
doesn't.

Anti-Spam: Change shellyfnospam to shellyf to respond. Thanx, y'all have a nice day!
Retired to Cyberspace from Green Valley, AZ.