H
hagman
I've distributed signature files for all users in my firm with the
following (shortened) looks:
a) sig.htm
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML xmlns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-
comfficeffice"><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso8859-1">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt;mso-no-proof: yes; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-
fareast-f
ont-family: Calibri; COLOR: black">
<P style="margin:0;">(text)</P>
<P style="margin:0;">(text)</P>
<P style="margin:0; mso-layout-grid-align:
none">_______________________________
______________<BR>
Hagen von Eitzen</P>
<P style="margin:0; mso-layout-grid-align: none">(text)</P>
<P style="margin:0;">(text)</P>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt;mso-no-proof: yes; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-
fareast-fo
nt-family: Calibri; COLOR: black">
<P style="margin:0;">(text)</P>
</DIV>
</BODY>
</HTML>
b) sig.rtf
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1031{\fonttbl{\f0\fswiss
\fcharset0 Arial;}}
{\colortbl ;\red0\green0\blue255;}
{\*\generator Msftedit 5.41.15.1507;}\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 (text)
\par
\par
(text)\par
\fs16 (text)\par
(text)\par
}
c) sig.txt
(text)
Thus you will note that I want the signature to consist of black arial
text, the first part in 10pt size and the second in 8pt size (except
of course in text-only format). We have various different versions of
Outlook on different versions of Windows on our site, but the files
above should look barebone enough to be understandable by all
versions. A first test seems to confirm this as preparing a new
message always displays a well-formatted signature.
But it has turned out that weird things happen:
I have before me a mail that was written by A to B, then B replies to
A, A forwards to C, C replies to A, A replies to C, C forwards to B
(all in-house).
This mail contains three signatures of A. The first two signatures
look ok, but the third differs: It is in Times instead of Arial and
all in one font size (10pt) only. Some other metrics (paragraph
lineheight and margin) seem to be corrupted as well. Interestingly,
the enforced black colour *is* applied (though it would look better if
were the same colour as the forwarding mail text, i.e. typically
blue), but that was my fault as I specifically wrote "COLOR: black" in
the signature file.
The whole thing is somewhat unpredictable but seems to be related only
to forwarding/replying and not to original mails.
The files given above were produced essentially by producing the
desired signature in Outlook and boiling the result down to its
essentials (decreasing file size by more than 70%). Actually, when we
initially distributed signatures edited from within outlook by copying
them from box to box (and just touching it to change the last name and
pbx), the inconsistency was even worse (i.e. already apparent with
original mails and not only with forward/reply); that's why we removed
all references to MsoNormal etc. - after all this seemde to be a big
improvement...
So the question is:
How can I produce uniform signature files that cause uniform Outlook
behaviour?
Thanks for any information,
hagman
following (shortened) looks:
a) sig.htm
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML xmlns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-
comfficeffice"><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso8859-1">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt;mso-no-proof: yes; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-
fareast-f
ont-family: Calibri; COLOR: black">
<P style="margin:0;">(text)</P>
<P style="margin:0;">(text)</P>
<P style="margin:0; mso-layout-grid-align:
none">_______________________________
______________<BR>
Hagen von Eitzen</P>
<P style="margin:0; mso-layout-grid-align: none">(text)</P>
<P style="margin:0;">(text)</P>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt;mso-no-proof: yes; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-
fareast-fo
nt-family: Calibri; COLOR: black">
<P style="margin:0;">(text)</P>
</DIV>
</BODY>
</HTML>
b) sig.rtf
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1031{\fonttbl{\f0\fswiss
\fcharset0 Arial;}}
{\colortbl ;\red0\green0\blue255;}
{\*\generator Msftedit 5.41.15.1507;}\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 (text)
\par
\par
(text)\par
\fs16 (text)\par
(text)\par
}
c) sig.txt
(text)
Thus you will note that I want the signature to consist of black arial
text, the first part in 10pt size and the second in 8pt size (except
of course in text-only format). We have various different versions of
Outlook on different versions of Windows on our site, but the files
above should look barebone enough to be understandable by all
versions. A first test seems to confirm this as preparing a new
message always displays a well-formatted signature.
But it has turned out that weird things happen:
I have before me a mail that was written by A to B, then B replies to
A, A forwards to C, C replies to A, A replies to C, C forwards to B
(all in-house).
This mail contains three signatures of A. The first two signatures
look ok, but the third differs: It is in Times instead of Arial and
all in one font size (10pt) only. Some other metrics (paragraph
lineheight and margin) seem to be corrupted as well. Interestingly,
the enforced black colour *is* applied (though it would look better if
were the same colour as the forwarding mail text, i.e. typically
blue), but that was my fault as I specifically wrote "COLOR: black" in
the signature file.
The whole thing is somewhat unpredictable but seems to be related only
to forwarding/replying and not to original mails.
The files given above were produced essentially by producing the
desired signature in Outlook and boiling the result down to its
essentials (decreasing file size by more than 70%). Actually, when we
initially distributed signatures edited from within outlook by copying
them from box to box (and just touching it to change the last name and
pbx), the inconsistency was even worse (i.e. already apparent with
original mails and not only with forward/reply); that's why we removed
all references to MsoNormal etc. - after all this seemde to be a big
improvement...
So the question is:
How can I produce uniform signature files that cause uniform Outlook
behaviour?
Thanks for any information,
hagman