I don't see how this is accounting for the A row.
I think the below will explain what I'm trying to do better.
I have 7 different employee identifiers. I also have 7 different Job
location identifiers. The master numbers identifying those identifiers will
be in columns X & Y.
X Y
1 Emp. Identifier List Job Identifier List
2 90 10
3 110 11
4 120 12
5 320 13
6 420 14
7 610 17
8 620 18
All the employees can do various jobs. They also have various different work
locations. The work locations may be very many, but in this scenario, I'm
only showing 11 total, 8 different.
So what I'm trying to show results in the E column as follows. Basically
total hours based on all/each of the other 3 different criterea. I can drag
the formula down as far as necessary, because I could envision potentially
quite a few results based on the various locations, employees, and locations.
Here's a few samples.
At location 158, emp 110 worked 2 hrs at job 14
At location 181, emp 110 worked 3 hrs at job 14
At location 210, emp 120 worked a total of 5 hrs at job 17
At location 210, emp 420 worked of 7 hrs at job 17
At location 391, emp 90 worked a total of 13 hrs at job 10, etc.
I also don't need the above wording, if I could just get the numbers like
391 90 10 13 that would be great.
row A B C D
1 Location Emp. Iden Hours Job identifier
2 158 110 2 14
3 181 110 3 14
4 210 120 4 17
5 210 120 1 17
6 210 420 7 17
7 296 610 6 11
8 310 620 3 17
9 311 90 2 10
10 333 110 2 11
11 391 90 8 10
12 391 90 5 10
Again, thank you very much for your patience, and if you want to bail out
afterall my poor explaining, I wouldn't blame you.
Thanks again,
Steve